IBEC has a licence to negotiate as a union and so it is one.
I wasn’t aware that the employee trade unions were exempt from the new legislation on lobbying. That seems ridiculous as they are the biggest, most powerful and most influential lobby groups in the country. If anything proves their power it is that exemption.
We should stop calling lobby groups social partners. Our democracy has been undermined enough over the last decade and a half.
It is one in part under its old FUE scope, the lobbying and policy work is not under the scope of a union. And as its the internet and we love technicalities, social partners are recognised at a national and European level as representatives of agreed interested parties (usually employers and empployees, but stretches to NGOs). That is different to lobbying as social partner work tends to be in an official minuted and documented capacity always under the freedom of information act, lobbying less so and is much more cloak and dagger. Social partners do lobby, but their submissions and positions are usually documented and publically available.
Anyway, for full disclosure, I'm ex-ibec, so while not biased towards them (I'm ex-union too), I think the actual influence of both social partners is overestimated, that may be presuming that ministers and senior civil servants listen to reasoned, rational arguments.
Back to the OT, i think there is much kudos to the demonstrators, how much impact it has is debateable. The problems with mandatory union recognition are considerable which is part of the reason that it has taken so long in the programme of government to come about. There are plenty of employers who operate very well, consult with their employees, offer fair terms and conditions, even exceed most t&cs and do so without recognising unions. Most of the bigger private employers do not recognise trade unions and yet seem to operate without any industrial relations issues.
As to zero hours, again, many employers offer these contracts and on its own zero hour contracts are not a bad thing. In many cases where the hours become more fixed, they offer full contracts. I do agree however that they are too easy to exploit and behave unethically around, but we have to be careful in that the service industry would suffer if it couldn't offer zero hour contracts at least initially.