I mean that when I purchase new property, I put in about 40% capital and get a 60% mortgage. Then rental income covers the montly mortgage payments. I have been doing this for years. However previously I had to stomp up only 20% capital with 80% mortgage.
I don't understand posters who talk about tentants subsidising landlords. If tentants income had always covered the entire purchase, I would own the entire country by now. It is never easy to buy property.
Then you are completely missing the point of the problem as it exists in the current market. People are not doing this. They are buying property but not at a rate where their rental income covers their mortgage repayments. Just because you do it differently does not mean that everyone is so sensible. The fact that it has changed that you have to put in 40% instead of 20% should be telling you this. There are people whose rental income does not even cover the interest part of their mortgage repayment, and there are people whose rental income doesn't cover their IO mortgage.
Do you think that this is healthy? You probably would reply by saying "well they should put more into the capital side when they are acquiring property" but a lot of would be investors are not actually able to do this. With them out of the market then it is entirely feasible to suggest that property prices would be a little lower and additionally, the supply profile of Irish property would be somewhat different. According to recent figures which have been linked ad infinitum on this site, up to 40% of last year's output was acquired by investors and this in a market of falling or static rents.