The RTB actually publishes data on the notices for termination that they have received.This clause is not well known but it has been kept in throughout all of the changes (four I think) to the Residential Tenancies Act since 2016.
I tend to agree.Simply extending the term of Part IV tenancies won't have any meaningful impact.
until someone or some body of people come together and challenge the state on it.
The property owner then has to apply to RTB, then from there to court to have the eviction order enforced and then have the tenants forcibly evicted if they are still overholding. This can easily take up to two years. In the meantime tenants most likely are not paying rent and in similar cases, extensive damage has been caused to the property.So say the landlord wants to sell the house, he gives proper notice to the tenant but when the notice period is up and the tenant has been unable to find alternative accommodation...what does the landlord do?
See note above - if notice has been given, there are grounds for doing so.Say , "it's not my problem, out you go",
See note above, it doesn't work that way.or agree to let them remain until such time as they have somewhere else to go? So no contract in place etc.
The new legislation also proposes to provide enhanced tenancy protection by making a ‘Part 4’ tenancy one of unlimited duration after a tenant has been in place for six months and not subject to expiry at the end of a six-year term.
It is intended that this would apply to new tenancies commencing six months or more after enactment of this Bill. In addition, where any existing tenancy is renewed after this time, it will become a tenancy of unlimited duration.
Indeed, I can't see any proposed amendment to the "Table" that follows Section 34 of the existing RTA which states that one ground for termination is the desire to sell on the open market. See below:Anyone any wiser?
3. The landlord intends, within F88 [ 9 months ] after the termination of the tenancy under this section, to enter into an enforceable agreement for the transfer to another, for full consideration, of the whole of his or her interest in the dwelling or the property containing the dwelling F86 [ and the notice of termination is accompanied by a statutory declaration referred to in section 35 ] .
Unless I am reading it wrong, subsection 3 means that landlords of existing tenancies will have to consent to tenancies of unlimited duration. I am not sure that any of them would do this voluntarily and it is a big protection for existing landlords.
The legislation proposes to provide enhanced tenancy protection by making a ‘Part 4’ tenancy one of unlimited duration after a tenant has been in place for six months and not subject to expiry at the end of a six-year term (at the discretion of the landlord).
It is intended that this would apply to new tenancies commencing six months or more after enactment of this Bill. In addition, where any existing tenancy is renewed after this time, it will become a tenancy of unlimited duration.
Yes, that’s my reading of the Bill as initiated.Looks like landlords can still terminate a tenancy if intention is to sell
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?