arandomdirtyman
Registered User
- Messages
- 3
The Regulations transposing the Directive include provisions setting out that the Minister may require air carriers to collect data on passengers for the purposes of establishing whether a passenger is a person of concern which is defined in Regulation 1(a) as
"person of concern" means a person who—
.........
(v) an offence under the Social Welfare Acts,
............
The Regulations provide for deletion of the passenger data within 24 hours or in the case of "a person of concern" up to 3 years or until he or she is no longer considered "a person of concern" whichever is the earlier. Persons who fail to comply with the requirements of the Regulations face a Class A fine or imprisonment for up to 12 months on summary conviction (or both) or for conviction on indictment to a fine of €500,000 or up to 3 years imprisonment (or both).
There is a legal basis for this. The obligation is on the airlines, not the airport:
Am personally very happy that taxpayers' money is being safeguarded in this fashion.
That's not correct - you are confusing the Pandemic Unemployment Payment with the Temporary Wage Subsidy Scheme.These people are not unemployed as such, they still technically employed
How do you take a holiday if you are unemployed? Holiday from what exactly?Aren't people who are currently on unemployment assistance entitled to "two weeks holidays" what's the difference
.How do you take a holiday if you are unemployed? Holiday from what exactly?
How is it discrimination to stop a welfare payment that is payable to somebody that is actively seeking work to a person that is not, in fact, actively seeking work?
You obviously can't be actively seeking work if you are on holidays or if you are self-isolating on your return.
Incidentally, it's not just PUP payments that have been stopped - jobseekers' payments have also been stopped.
Well, he would have to self-isolate for two weeks when he returns home.I know of one person on the payment currently in Southern France, he has had three interviews via zoom and if lucky enough to get a job will fly home.
If the job entails working from home then he can work away while self isolating.Well, he would have to self-isolate for two weeks when he returns home.
Do you think it's fair that the Irish taxpayer should pay for his holiday and two week quarantine? I don't.
Grand but he doesn't need the PUP in that case.If the job entails working from home then he can work away while self isolating.
Because the rules changed (for fairly obvious policy reasons).Why has it suddenly become a problem?
Yes, but he remains available to work during his holiday and during the 14 day period of isolation.Grand but he doesn't need the PUP in that case.
What are the obvious policy reasons?Because the rules changed (for fairly obvious policy reasons).
The Government is trying to discourage people from travelling abroad.What are the obvious policy reasons?
But only if they are the PUP or other forms of welfare it seems. If they don't want people to travel then they should stop people from travelling. They should not stop some people from travelling. I'm all for reforming the welfare system but not like this.The Government is trying to discourage people from travelling abroad.
But only if they are the PUP or other forms of welfare it seems. If they don't want people to travel then they should stop people from travelling. They should not stop some people from travelling. I'm all for reforming the welfare system but not like this.
No, the advice relates to everybody.But only if they are the PUP or other forms of welfare it seems
No, the advice relates to everybody.
It would be bonkers if the Government was advising people not to travel while simultaneously making welfare payments to people who choose to ignore this advice.
They are; everyone with a State funded pension or on any form of welfare outside that group who chooses to travel will continue to be paid.It would be bonkers if the Government was advising people not to travel while simultaneously making welfare payments to people who choose to ignore this advice.
They did.But they still publish a green.list .....
I dunno, but luckily I employ people, via the tens of thousands of Euro I pay every year in taxes, to come up with the answers to those questions. Luckily we have some of the best public servants in the world, just ask them, they'll confirm it. They could sort that out no problem.How would you propose they legally stop people from travelling without getting into a constitutional or EU treaty minefield?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?