Fingalian said:Why don't we enforce the laws we already have ?
Where do you stop? With everyone having a regulator so that a drunken garda can't speed down the road and cause carnage?dodo said:Would it be a good idea to put restricters on the cars of young male drivers who seem to be the main risk for accidents,
ronan_d_john said:Why don't people drive in a manner so as to not put themselves and other road users in danger of fatal accidents?
Something very like this has been the practice for donkeys' years, in other European countries, and doesn't specifically target young or male drivers, just inexperienced ones. Apart from/alongside that, a little enforcement of the current laws would go a long way, IMHO.michaelm said:Might be simpler/better to restrict restrict L drivers and R drivers (when you pass the test you should have to display an R for a year) to a small engined car, maybe 1.2 litre and set a max. speed limit of 90KPH.
And why not? Look at the statistics.DOBBER22 said:Young drivers takin the rap again it seems
Theo said:Because that's like saying, "why don't criminals stop breaking the law?"
Unfortunately, you cannot depend on people to do this, it has to be enforced.
dodo said:speeding ie from red cow down to mac Donalds in 50K an hour
Yeah, that shuold be our priority alright, those pesky unrestrained kids cause so many accidents!!I agree with those who suggest we focus on enforcing the existing laws. My suggested priority would be the yummy-mummies of Dublin 4 who seem to feel that their children don't need to be restrained during the creche/school run.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?