I will say that where someone is capable of paying but refuses to then fair enough, force an order to evict
Like I said, if some are able to pay rent but choose not to, then invoke an eviction
As a form of protest, they refuse to pay their rent to the LA.
In your world, this is a straightforward case of eviction as per the law - I dont disagree,
If, by your definition, a rent adjusted LA tenant is automatically "wont pay", I have already stated that an eviction should be invoked in such circumstances.
If someone is capable of paying rent but refuses they should be evicted. I have said this plenty of times.
Tenants who can afford to pay their rent but refuse to do so should face eviction.
I have repeatedly said - if someone CAN pay, but REFUSES to pay, invoke an eviction order.
The prospect of eviction" is different from eviction. Please edit 4 above for clarity, then it
You only suggest that they should face the prospect of eviction.
You can't just answer the question then?
A homeless family refusing an offer of accommodation has nothing to do with a LA tenant refusing to pay rent when they have been assessed as being capable of doing so.
Why do you ask?
I ask because you brought it up in the context of trying to justify why LA tennnts might be refusing to pay rent. Thanks for confirming it's just another rabbit hole.
There was me thinking Leo was someone who at least offered reasoned rationale for his views whether I agreed with them or not.
Turns out your every bit the joker like the rest of them.
You can go down multiple rabbit holes at will when challenged, yet I'm a joker when I point out an argument you're putting forward makes no sense
You'll note I didn't offer a view, just pointed out your flawed argument.
You can't just answer the question then?
I was referring to your views in general, not specifically in this topic (if any).
I suspect you will be moving from the rabbit hole to the sin bin,I was referring to your views in general, not specifically in this topic (if any).
So using your own words,
Yep, anyone who disagrees with you is a joker, anyone who sees flaws in your logic is absurd.There was me thinking Leo was someone who at least offered reasoned rationale for his views whether I agreed with them or not.
Turns out your every bit the joker like the rest of them.
Firstly, I doubt you have a good understanding of my view in general. Secondly, any such speculation in this thread would be very much off topic and yet another rabbit hole.
Yep, anyone who disagrees with you is a joker, anyone who sees flaws in your logic is absurd.
You're joking right?anyone who accuses me of trying to justify refusal of rent payment when you know only too well that I have said on numerous occasions the opposite
taking into account also the legitimate refusal to pay rent due to dire need of renovation
So can you just answer the question I put to you then?
how did you deduce that I try to justify refusal of rent payment?
You are constantly making the simplistic assumption that the 15% of arrears is nothing more than a bare faced refusal to pay where there is means to pay.
You ignore all other possible factors despite repeated reports of substandard accommodation, homeless families refusing accommodation, social disorders and deprivation.
Why?
You're joking right?
Admittedly im not too au fait with the law concerning the grounds upon which not to pay rent.
But refusal to pay can be a likely prospect where a landlord is failing to provide adequate repairs
Yeh, great, I get legal obligation to continue to pay...b
that may not stop some tenants taking it upon themselves to refuse to pay.
Well, what I really said was 'you brought it up in the context of trying to justify why LA tenants might be refusing to pay rent.' Just go back to the post I quoted:
Where did I say that?Or do you think, like Purple, that "they probably" have goods incomes and simply gaming the system?
I think that's the crux of the matter; the rest of us just aren't as smart as you. How could we be, otherwise we'd all be socialists, right?No of those complexities will ever be addressed by the half-baked, kindergarten proposals spouted out here.
So you appear to have changed you mind
Yeh, great, I get legal obligation to continue to pay...
In that case, what point exactly are you trying to make on this thread? Please give us a succinct answer without any further deflection.
is it really beyond your comprehension to not figure that some LA arrears may refuse to pay rent because of unresolved landlord/tenant disputes (regardless of the legalities)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?