I don't need to go anywhere, because this topic is entitled "We must dismantle our culture of dependency" and you should thank the contributors in the other thread, for going into the very details that they did - but it doesn't change this topic.
Yes, you took a lot of time - maybe if you just concentrated on the topic, instead of continually dragging it off, then you might have spent your time and energy on productive discussion.
Which is exactly what I said, I never mentioned "security of tenure" because that is a different issue.
Yes it is a demand, because she has turned down two housing opportunities, because they do not fit what she wants. She wants a particular property, in particular area and she wants it for life - that isn't the problem though, the problem is that she wants the state to provide it.
She is demanding from the State, what most people are working hard to provide for themselves, by themselves. They share that view, but they don't demand that the state provide it - indeed, were it only the case that we could all go to the state with a wish list.
You are defending a culture of entitlement and a welfare dependency culture, like the populist parties who use these people as fodder to progress their own careers.
