Solar Energy and saving money

You should probably also consider adding a battery since your inverter is likely to be a hybrid inverter. A battery may allow you to switch to a day/night rate and so you might absorb a higher day rate (maybe by 2c or so) for the benefit of loading up a battery (say 5kWh) at ~14c overnight. As the solar tops up the battery throughout the day, you are also improving your overall solar consumption rate.

For a heat-pumped house though (i.e. with a larger consumption of electricity, particularly in winter), it may even be worth looking at a bigger battery than this - the economics may stack up for something as large as 2x15kWh even if it requires reducing the solar array size to fund it.

As a non-heat-pumped household with pre-EV usage of ~5,500kWh per year, I'm already looking to upgrade my 5kWh battery.
Conor - thanks for input above. Just one query on your analysis - the estimated payback term seems to jump quite a bit when the battery is factored in whereas I would have thought that by adding a battery, the payback term would be similar to solar only as the battery makes the system more efficient. Is this the case or are the cost of batteries still relatively high compared to the potential savings?

I have received a few quotes for my house over the past few weeks - I am looking at an average cost of 9k excluding battery. This includes 22 panels, an inverter and optimizers. The price including a 5kwh battery and power module jumps to an average of approx. 12.5k so it is an extra 3.5k for the battery option.

I guess my question is how do I analyze the daily/annual saving that a battery can generate? Is it by looking at the daily usage x the differential between the daytime and nighttime rate? Our average daily usage during summer months is 16kwh and anywhere between 25-30kwh during the winter months.
 
the estimated payback term seems to jump quite a bit when the battery is factored in whereas I would have thought that by adding a battery, the payback term would be similar to solar only as the battery makes the system more efficient.
Can you see the workings of the calculation? Some of the older ones just assumed you'd only charge the battery using excess solar when available so the savings were negligible when you factored in the alternative of getting paid for that excess solar. However, with some of the smart plans now targeted at EV owners, it's possible to charge the battery fully overnight and sell excess solar, making for a more compelling case.
 
Can you see the workings of the calculation? Some of the older ones just assumed you'd only charge the battery using excess solar when available so the savings were negligible when you factored in the alternative of getting paid for that excess solar. However, with some of the smart plans now targeted at EV owners, it's possible to charge the battery fully overnight and sell excess solar, making for a more compelling case.
The workings are pretty basic as they just show any excess being pushed back to the grid for a fixed price. My guess is that the payback on the battery is much shorter than I was thinking it was if it is used efficiently and if the right smart plan is chosen.
 
My guess is that the payback on the battery is much shorter than I was thinking it was if it is used efficiently and if the right smart plan is chosen.
Up until the smart tariffs came along with the potential to charge overnight at super cheap rates, the consensus was that batteries didn't make financial sense. Remember, the battery will have a shorter life than most of the rest of the solar system components. As a result you need to be sure you can make full use of it to ensure you get payback before it requires replacement.
 
Does the battery operate on an age life span or usage life span? Though assume that you would not buy it if you are not going to use it efficiently!
 
Does the battery operate on an age life span or usage life span? Though assume that you would not buy it if you are not going to use it efficiently!
The battery in question has a 10 year warranty so would imagine life span won't be too much longer than that.

I think the question on using it efficiently is what I am struggling with because what I am trying to understand is the payback term. Firstly, our annual requirements are about 35% greater than the maximum amount of solar energy that the panels can supply so in most months, I would expect us to utilize the majority of the solar power we generate as we use quite a lot of power during daylight hours. If we don't use it, it gets sold back to the grid at a certain price - around 15c per unit.

What does using it efficiently mean in my scenario if we are already using most of the solar or selling it back to the grid? Does efficient use come down to something like charging early morning to avail of a very low rate (say 6c). If that is it, the payback term becomes very long and it doesn't seem like a good investment at this time.
 
Using the battery to charge overnight on an EV rate and then selling your solar back to the grid at FIT rates and minimise your purchase of grid units....you pocket the difference. There are so many permutations to this and it replies on the EV rate being much lower than FIT. You would need to do up a file with all your inputs costs and make assumptions about all rates etc. Then layer in potential other income you could earn from the battery money! I think using solar/batteries etc relies on the user being savvy with usage which a lot of people tend not to be - though anyone I know who has gotten solar def gets stuck into it!
 
Does the battery operate on an age life span or usage life span?

A combination of both really. My warranty guarantees that the battery will still retain at least 60% of its original capacity after 10 years of normal use. (Normal isn't defined!)
 
Back
Top