Incorrect again, activation simply involves enabling the meter send readings to ESB Networks every 30 minutes.No , its not. The majority of Irish people now have a smart meter installed , but is not activated for a " time of day" smart meter tariff , like yourself.
Exactly, it amazes me how many people have no idea what they're talking about, haven't put even the slightest bit of effort into actually understanding it and fall for the grand conspiracy theories and are absolutely convinced everything from smart meters to fluoridation and vaccines are all part of some massive conspiracy to subjugate us!As to your attitude to smart meters, it genuinely is following an uneducated pitchforks-and-torches herd.
me too, i was a spar employee for 5 minutes and got the flogas BWG affinity tariff, with a large battery HV and a heat pump d/n still best for us.I’ve got a similar system to the OP for 2 years now. Have a smart meter but still on a day/night tariff . I ran the numbers and it works best for our house. It’s horses for courses but it’s a really good investment.
Yeah, I've seen the use of the term 'switching' used for moving between the MCC profiles. It;s switching from one configuration code to another rather than an activation.I'm beginning to wonder if "activation" may have different meanings here - (a) just getting the smart meter installed and working, (b) activation of the meter to automatically report readings to ESB Networks, and (c) activation of smart services changing the MCC from MCC01/MCC02 to MCC12/MCC16?
Leo , you may need to check this out again. If you are on a MCC01 configuration you are still on an old style 24 hour tarrif. Sounds like you have a smart meter fitted but you have not signed up to a smart tarriff yet. If you are on a smart meter tariff the code on your bill should be a MCC12 or MCC16. Maybe you are looking at an older bill.Yeah, I've seen the use of the term 'switching' used for moving between the MCC profiles. It;s switching from one configuration code to another rather than an activation.
My own meter is still on the MCC01 configuration and I have access to the 30 minute billing data via the ESB Networks portal.
My meter is in MCC02 mode on a (non-smart) "Nightsaver" day/night tariff and I can download half hourly readings from My Smart Data. I don't think that there's anything incorrect or contradictory in @Leo's post.Leo , you may need to check this out again. If you are on a MCC01 configuration you are still on an old style 24 hour tarrif. Sounds like you have a smart meter fitted but you have not signed up to a smart tarriff yet. If you are on a smart meter tariff the code on your bill should be a MCC12 or MCC16. Maybe you are looking at an older bill.
I don't think that @Leo was issueing a blanket recommendation for smart tariffs - just where there is solar installed locally or the smart plan would otherwise yield savings given a particular user's electricity usage patterns.This is not my point , Clubman. I too have a smart meter fitted , configured as MCC01 an old style 24 hour tarrif, but like you and Leo , I am not signed up for a smart meter TARRIFF , which was what was being recommended by Leo.
Activating the meter will enable accurate measurement of what you export likely getting you a better payment.
You'd be mad not to take another look. A smart plan will almost certainly work out cheaper where there is solar.
Where? I can't see that he says that anywhere.the point of my last post is that he says in a previous reply he has on in a smart meter tariff himself
Ah the danger of implications. I am still on a standard 24 hour tariff, I've recently bought a plug-in hybrid so I want a few months data with that to see what difference it makes to the calculations.He certainly implied it with this statement. If Leo is adamant that smart plans are cheaper based on his usage data over the past few months , why is he not taking his own advice.?
The point I'm making is that everyone needs to look at the actual data in their own situation and make there minds up based on the evidence. Too much of the commentary online regarding smart meters is grossly and demonstrably inaccurate, and I have little patience for the herd that fall for such nonsense.Wheelie bin is making an important point. It seems Leo is strongly endorsing smart tariffs and at same time it seems Leo is not on a smart tariff. Best thing would be for Leo to clarify rather than other attempting to defend Leo. As wheelie said its very important that accurate and clear info is given and there is a lack of clarity on this point.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?