Update: Just to mention, after several unsuccessful attempts to contact SKY and to get them to acknowledge messages, I have made a formal complaint. The crux of the complaint is the impossibility (bar giving up several hours of my life waiting in the web chat vortex) of engaging meaningfully with SKY to resolve my problem and this is directly caused by an inability (contractual or otherwise) to simply switch providers without reference to the existing supplier, as can be done with a host of other services from banking to insurance. And, as a further point, a new customer may get the same service I have for almost 30 Euros cheaper. This dual pricing is in itself unfair.
In essence, I want to leave SKY to go to a competitor. SKY, having placed several obstacles in my way to communicating with them at all, finally told me that after waiting 1:30 mins and connecting to a REP, that he wouldn't be able to cancel my account, and that I must now speak to someone in their loyalty team. It wa then 4:15 pm, he then informs me that he'll put me on hold for them, (via webchat), and to bear in mind that they close at 5:30pm (1:15 mins time) and if they don't get to me, they'll be in touch after 9am the following day. I did not succeed in getting through to anyone and no one called me back since.
I have now told SKY formally that I will be leaving and to take an email as notification (they require 31 days notice). Also, that I have no intention of holding another minute trying to connect with them. I have informed them that I will cancel the DD and they may send a box to collect their equipment, and furthermore, that I would no stay with SKY if they offered their services for free. I copied JD Buckely the MD of SKY Ireland, COMREG and Eamon Ryan, Minister for Communications.
I further raised the fact that I can move my mobile phone, my insurances, my electricity or gas without needing to contact the existing provider, and it is high time this also applied to TV/Broadband, I'm not sure what the legislation around this is, but it seems that the 'hold' if there is one, for SKY or any other similar service, is the requirement on the customer to contact them first. I will not, under normal circumstances, break an obligation - it was why I went to the trouble to contact them in the first place, but this situation is totally unacceptable, If COMREG hasn't got powers to protect the customer, then they should have. I also raised the point that for people who for whatever reason like disability cannot use the phone, then it seems SKY has trapped them in a catch 22 altogether.
It will be interesting to see what comes out of this, and particularly, will the government act to protect the consumer.