And even more importantly, selling the LHR slots will recoup around 250 Million of his expenditure on the company -
Hasn't it been discussed here before that it's quite unlikely that slots in Heathrow are not actually a saleable commodity?
And even more importantly, selling the LHR slots will recoup around 250 Million of his expenditure on the company -
Did anyone hear our Transport Minister in the Dail yesterday saying that because the Articles of Association of Aer Lingus couldn't be changed, that there were protections in place?
Yet again a ridiculous pronouncement by a key player in this saga who hasn't a clue what they're talking about. If Michael O'Leary is up against Martin Cullen and John Sharman (from OP comments), then he's got absolutely nothing to worry about.
Could never understand the hang up about getting access to that airport. There are other major hubs that are much easier to use when having to get connecting flights and if the demand is there for the DUB-LHR route, some airline will always provide it.
Aer Lingus has little future on routes from Ireland to Europe.
Initially I'd assumed there was no way this buyout would pass the relevant competition authorities. However, Ryanair don't compete with Aer Lingus on long haul routes, so there may be a creative solution that would satisfy the regulators (e.g. a breakup of Aer Lingus!).
Minister Cullen also said that Ryanair had not dealt with the implications for the bilateral agreement between Ireland and the US. This requires that any airline designated by Ireland to provide transatlantic services must be majority owned and controlled by Irish nationals. 'There is a serious risk that the merged entity would not meet that requirement,' he said.
Anyone want to take odds on the Irish government buying Ryan Air's stake in the company
Oh dear oh dear....this looks to me like Ducksy O'Leary will appeal to the EU Court of Justice to force de guvmint to sell up! Game over!"The Dutch government said on Thursday that it would accelerate discussions with (cargo airline) TNT to cancel the “golden share” it holds in the mail and express company, following a ruling by the European Court of Justice that the construction was unlawful.
The court said the mechanism, which had given the state a veto on mergers and takeovers, “restricted the free movement of capital”.
Published: September 28 2006
We were all held hostage by the inefficient, overpaid and underworked people at Aer Lingus for so long in the 70's and 80's etc.
......... do you still therefore believe this to be the case in 2006?
No, they are not as inefficient, overpaid and underworked as they were decades ago, thanks to the competition from Ryanair etc and the management of Willie Walsh etc. Remember the days 25 years ago when we paid £££ to fly to London, when money was money ( a reasonable house was £ 15,000 ) ?
In my opinion, Aer Lingus are caught between being a dynamic, efficient low cost operator like Ryanair and being a friendly, premium airline. Comparing the last few times I flew with each, the Ryanair staff were nicer / fliendlier, and the Ryanair flights were more punctual.
You have to hand it to O'Leary and his team. A great Irish success story. They are still expanding their number of hubs abroad etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rabbit [broken link removed]
We were all held hostage by the inefficient, overpaid and underworked people at Aer Lingus for so long in the 70's and 80's etc.
......... do you still therefore believe this to be the case in 2006?
Meaningless comparison -- Ryanair outsource all of the ground-crew functions.yet Air Lingus has 13% more staff than Ryanair.