They said that they are not engaged in paramilitary/terrorist activates. Who do you think is laundering the Diesel, smuggling the cigarettes and running the protection rackets?Do you accept the assessments of Gardai and PSNI that PIRA members are engaged in democratic programs of a peaceful nature?
Mick Clifford writes well on this topic.
I'm not going down that rabbit hole again either. You drank the Shinner Koolaid. It's like arguing evolution with a creationist.He writes poorly on the topic.
He claims GOIRA had a democratic mandate to wage against Britain. It did not. It could not. Nowhere in the SF Manifesto for 1918 election was a declaration of war against Britain made. It made reference to, and danced around the prospect of using "every means necessary" to establish a Republic and it invoked the Proclaimation and the principle of inalienable rights of the Irish people and Irish sovereignty.
But ultimately however it concluded that "Sinn Féin will oppose at the Polls every individual candidate who does not accept this principle."
There was no declaration of war, there was no mandate for war. In fact it was January 1920 that the Dáil first debated the motion of formally declaring war against Britain. That motion was defeated.
A brilliant piece. His closing paragraph sums it up very well.Mick Clifford writes well on this topic.
Mick Clifford said:One day, perhaps when those who ran the IRA no longer have influence, the Shinners will accept the wrongs committed and leave the past alone.
So far, in that respect, they are, as Deputy Stanley might put it, slow learners.
I'm not going down that rabbit hole again either. You drank the Shinner Koolaid. It's like arguing evolution with a creationist.
A neat little summary - an object lesson in fairness.Commonplace? Hardly! In a normal party, advisors advise and Ministers decide. That's not what's going on here. The man who needed to be made content is calling the shots (if you pardon the expression, ahem.)
Now, if this were an isolated incident, yeah, you could write it off as unfortunate. Poor choice of words, under time pressure, that sort of thing. But put it beside, just to take a few examples:
- the Bobby Storey funeral, at the height of Covid restrictions, with paramilitary homage style dress and behaviour.
- Mary Lou and Conor Murphy at odds over the Paul Quinn murder, with the former wearing her best deer in headlights look when confronted with Murphy's words on live TV.
- David "tiocfaidh ar lá" Cullinane
- the Kingsmills bread stunt.
- more allegations of bullying than every other party put together.
- Brian Stanley's tweet
- the treatment of Maria Cahill
- the unique level of personal abuse coming from SF supporters on social media.
and you've got a pattern. You will of course say that every single one of the above can be explained away, nothing to see here, all parties do stuff, etc etc.
But when you put it all together, it's a compelling basis to say SF is different. It's not just another party.
Liar! I suppose we should be thankful. Not thankful to them of course but thankful that they see a need to keep their dogma as far from view as possible from a gullible millennial electorate.Irish Times said:He (MacDonncha) said he and Sinn Féin had not snubbed the event. “There is no question of a boycott here. That is just not the case, and I wouldn’t like to see anyone making mischief out of this.”
This is the shocker. For a start it lays bare the lie that he has just given that he didn't boycott the event. Much more sinister we see here the McDowell syndrome. Who could possibly see an equivalence in that incident between the murder of two guardians of the State and the execution of their murderers? Only those who have to recite each day on bended knees before a framed copy of The Proclamation the republican Credo "I believe in the 32 county socialist republic, I believe in Bobby Sands, I believe in Bobby Storey etc. etc."Irish Times said:MaccDonncha added “Two gardaí died in the course of their duties. Two republicans were also executed and we would pay tribute to them.
Of course he wouldn't need permission for that. Probably got a few congratulatory texts from AC for his initiative.Wolfe Tone said:Kingsmill 'bread stunt' - are you suggesting permission was sought from AC for that? Please!
This is the shocker.
A great postCommonplace? Hardly! In a normal party, advisors advise and Ministers decide. That's not what's going on here. The man who needed to be made content is calling the shots (if you pardon the expression, ahem.)
Now, if this were an isolated incident, yeah, you could write it off as unfortunate. Poor choice of words, under time pressure, that sort of thing. But put it beside, just to take a few examples:
- the Bobby Storey funeral, at the height of Covid restrictions, with paramilitary homage style dress and behaviour.
- Mary Lou and Conor Murphy at odds over the Paul Quinn murder, with the former wearing her best deer in headlights look when confronted with Murphy's words on live TV.
- David "tiocfaidh ar lá" Cullinane
- the Kingsmills bread stunt.
- more allegations of bullying than every other party put together.
- Brian Stanley's tweet
- the treatment of Maria Cahill
- the unique level of personal abuse coming from SF supporters on social media.
and you've got a pattern. You will of course say that every single one of the above can be explained away, nothing to see here, all parties do stuff, etc etc.
But when you put it all together, it's a compelling basis to say SF is different. It's not just another party.
I am pinching myself. So you agree with MacDonncha that the commemoration should have included a balanced reference to the injustice of executing their IRA murderers? I have given some respect to your provocative (I mean that as a compliment) challenge of the more conventional viewpoint but please say it isn't so that you agree with MacDonncha on that.And yet this country cannot bring itself to commemorate the lives of RIC officers. Irish men with families, who for the most part just went about their business of guardians of the State.
Unable to move on, unable to draw a line in the sand.
What a shocker indeed!
So you agree with MacDonncha that the commemoration should have included a balanced reference to the injustice of executing their murderers?
I have given some respect to your provocative (I mean that as a compliment) challenge of the more conventional viewpoint but please say it isn't so that you agree with MacDonncha on that.
so you do see the gardai that were murdered and the execution of their IRA assassins as equal victims of our troubled past.
SF were duly exposed and almost certainly due to the implicit or explicit command from the retirement cumman decided that to attend would be against the faith.
@WolfeTone, if the Shinners agreed with you they'd have turned up at the commemoration of the two Gardaí murdered by the IRA that they claim lineage with.
I'm no student of history but as far as I recall the IRA weren't killing people in Belgium in 1916.
See above.It doesn't real sit well with the narrative that the AC are instructing boycotts of Garda commemorations but permitting attendance at British War commemorations, does it?
In this country and in Northern IrelandThere is plenty of that, particularly in this jurisdiction.
See aboveIf you were right about AC directing SF then Michelle O Néill would hardly be attending a British War commemoration.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?