So you agree with MacDonncha that the commemoration should have included a balanced reference to the injustice of executing their murderers?
Where did I say that? But for what it is worth if the underlying premise of 21st Ireland is resolve all our quarrels through peaceful and democratic forums in the absence of the gun then some time and space must be afforded to all protagonists of the conflicts that littered Ireland with violence in the 20th so that the sleeping dog does not lie, it rests in peace.
I have given some respect to your provocative (I mean that as a compliment) challenge of the more conventional viewpoint but please say it isn't so that you agree with MacDonncha on that.
It is the conventional viewpoint that is provocative. The white-washing of hideous crimes by our Republican forefathers and the transformation into gallant hero's.
This discussion has continued over several threads now. There can be no more a galling hypocrisy of watching the sheep happy-clapping the President of Ireland euligising the memory of Thomas Clarke as he cuts a ribbon to name (yet another) landmark, bridges and train stations, of someone who was engaged in the indiscriminate bombing of bridges and train stations leading to the murder of a 14yr school boy.
Simultaneously they propel themselves into the high moral ground and condemn the terrorists who indiscriminately bomb bridges and train stations, and shopping arenas murdering innocent boys in Warrington.
Let it be known, that Fenian Brotherhood of Clarke and Co was everybit as popular in 1880's for its bombing campaign as the PIRA was in 1990's.
Can you explain that? Can anyone explain why the office of President of Ireland is used, and endorsed by the political establishment across the floor, to commemorate and glorify Thomas Clarke?
My whole position in this is that in 1998 the people of All Ireland decided that from here on in whatever our differences the gun needs to be taken out of Irish politics, permanently.
Two ways perhaps to do that. Either condemn all of those who embarked on the futile task of freedom through violent means throughout the ages, or,
allow everybody, all protagonists, time and space to commemorate their dead and in turn aspire to a future without violence.
Some acknowledgement that our trouble past is more complex than the black and white good v bad guys would help.
It was Her Majesty QE2 who said, in one of the finest speeches I have ever heard,
"
Indeed, so much of this visit reminds us of the complexity of our history, its many layers and traditions, but also the importance of forbearance and conciliation. Of being able to bow to the past, but not be bound by it...
To all those who have suffered as a consequence of our troubled past I extend my sincere thoughts and deep sympathy. With the benefit of historical hindsight we can all see things which we would wish had been done differently or not at all."
Whatever the political differences. Whether decommissioned IRA men are giving the go ahead for Renewal Heat Incentive Schemes or lobbyists for private medical organisations are getting ahead in contract negotiations, or cosy public appointments for close friends and associates, it is a far cry from the bloodshed that has riddled this country in the 20th century.
I'm mindful of the hyperbolic paranoia being peddled and whipped up by media and political cronies for their own selfish political interests as opposed to moving to a future without paramilitaries.
The Bobby Storey funeral arrangements were sanctioned by the PSNI.
The Pat Howell email was about endorsing DUP public policy.