Fair points but I would imagine that it taints New Beginning's reputation in the eyes of some people whether that's fair or not.It's a good question but I think that barristers are supposed to put their clients' cases forward as best they can. They don't have to believe in their client's case and they don't have to like the client.
I would have thought that this issue of whether or not a Protective Certificate trumps a Circuit Court order for possession is worth airing in the High Court.
The High Court judge "reluctantly" granted a stay so that it could be appealed to the High Court.
The Barrister is doing his job.
The guy has lived rent-free for 9 years. He probably has plenty of money to pay legal fees.
If we as a Society allow a system where someone can live in their home for years without paying and without being repossessed, don't blame the barristers who advocate on behalf of their clients.
Brendan
Brendan was making this very point on the radio yesterday while discussing the McNamara case with Michael Dowling, a mortgage broker AND a PIP!We regularly hear complaints about the mortgage interest rates in Ireland and how much higher they are compared to the rest of the EU. However the two recent high profile cases demonstrate the difficult of enforcing mortgage contracts even when a client pays nothing for 9 years. Re-possessions seem like an alien concept to the Courts even in clear cut cases. The concept that borrowers are expected to repay borrowings seems now to be questionable. How much more cost does that impose on compliant mortgage payers if rates are inflated to cover those who are non-compliant?
Delboy which show was that?
I love the judge ordering them to make the mortgage payment. I wonder will they, like what would be the point. Might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb.
The Last Word if I recall correctly. Around 5.30pmDelboy which show was that?
I love the judge ordering them to make the mortgage payment. I wonder will they, like what would be the point. Might as well be hung for a sheep as a lamb.
You think he’ll be jailed if he doesn’t make the repayment. LOL I think that’s highly unlikely. Me, I’ve the popcorn in for the 2nd Sept. because I can’t even begin to imagine what new level of insanity in our courts will prevail.Well failing to obey a judge's order can have you jailed for contempt.
Ignoring your responsibilities under a contract seems to be penalty free, but judges look on your obligations to the court in a very different light, maybe.
Maybe one if them will be sick and there will be a further extension.
Well you wanna bet me a fiver!
Didn't see your reply till now. It's three weeks tomorrow. LOL.Your on !
Ronan Ryan appears to be a victim of the professions
He also said Mr Ryan had never heard of the personal insolvency regime when he consented to the possession order. “He had never heard of personal insolvency. His accountant hadn’t told him. His [then] solicitors, his legal advisors, hadn’t told him. And he didn’t know it was an option,” said Mr Farry.
And his Personal Insolvency Practitioner who applied for the Protective Cert did not know that this client had consented to an order for possession.
It's a mad world out there.
Brendan
It's a mad world out there.
I presume you're not believing this rouse for a second?!
Is this happening with lesser known people and far cheaper properties as well?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?