Children also learn important life skills by playing pretend games with their friends, and by climbing trees, and by poking dead animals with sticks, and by visiting the beach, or their cousins, or an art gallery. There is more to life than classrooms (or publically paid childminding, as some people seem to expect).
Cause they might learn more. Why not extend the school day by half an hour for example and teach them a languague? Why not extend the school year by 2 or 3 weeks more and teach them more computer skills or maths. ?
Why not extend the school year by 2 or 3 weeks more and teach them more computer skills or maths. ?
The main reason that the school year cannot be extended is that the school year is standardised by agreement between school managers , teacher unions , parent organisations & other relevant bodies.
The current agreement runs until Easter 2014.
My daughter's school do this every year - intercultural week - with tasting of different foods, wearing of traditional clothes etc. They're not sitting round waiting for AAM to tell them how to do their business.Or have a cultural week focusing on countries like China, Japan or India and learn a small bit of the language.
It's never to young to introduce children to new things.
No, they don't. They spend considerable amounts of after-school and weekend time doing homework.Kids have all weekend,and after school to play pretend,
I don't dispute any of that, but you still haven't given a single reason why you think that children would benefit from spending longer at school.
Cause they might learn more.
No, they don't. They spend considerable amounts of after-school and weekend time doing homework.
Perhaps the 13 year old who was playing with my 7 year old last night?Ahh come on now,what child who "plays pretend ", spends considerable amounts of time doing homework!
Then perhaps the challenge should be for the new Govt to renegotiate a new deal for post 2014, which is within the life time of the current Dail
It's astounds me that at a time when the whole country knows we are short of languague skills/math skills and sciences, we let secondry school kids have almost 4-5 months a year off school. That's not much of an investment for the future
Did you forget to mention UNIONS in your list above?The other argument is that the standardised school year is set by those most involved & those best qualified - school management , teachers & parent organisations.
From what I can gather direct Government involvement is minimal.
Kids do get homework,but its age related and if they are spending considerable amounts of time doing it,there is something not right..
In my kids (primary )schools they correct each others homework....dare I say it..less work for the teacher!
And there is much debate about the homework issue anyway,perhaps extra time in school would cover the need to have to do homework at all...
Did you forget to mention UNIONS in your list above?
I doubt that Unions were consulted when the school days and holidays were originally set.
It makes a bit of a mess of the teachers argument that they spend so much time correcting home work,when in fact in some cases the kids correct each others plus they dont get homework on Fridays.
You can be guaranteed they will be consulted if there is any sniff of a change though..
Did you forget to mention UNIONS in your list above?
Where or when did the teachers make this arguement?It makes a bit of a mess of the teachers argument that they spend so much time correcting home work
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?