TheBigShort
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,789
There you go again about landlords.
Im not the one criticising her for receiving income to pay to keep a roof over head and children.
There you go again about landlords.
When did you say that?
I have no problem on commenting or criticising travellers if it is based on factual and accurate information. All I have done is point out the inaccuracies in the criticism.
For instance, do you know if she receives all those welfare payments or not?
If she doesn't, and I have identified some anomalies in the poster graphic that would imply she doesn't, then all this commentary is based on false and misleading information and should cease.
Regardless of what you think of this person, targeting her publicly for criticism on a false premise is as repugnant as targeting you publicly on a false premise.
Wouldn't you agree?
she depends entirely on the government !
You were deliberating disregarding HAP from that calculation as you said it went to the landlord which is what Bronte was pointing out. Now your trying to sidestep that by pulling at heart strings.
The usual predictable 'round the house' posts that you bog down every thread you contribute to with
Im not the one criticising her for receiving income to pay to keep a roof over head and children.
i would not agree as mrs cash has not been targeted , quite the opposite , she has harnessed the media to her cause .
Regardless of what you think of this person, targeting her publicly for criticism on a false premise is as repugnant as targeting you publicly on a false premise.
Wouldn't you agree?
I didn't deliberately disregard anything. Quite the opposite actually, I pointed out how the graphic above paints a picture that is far from reality.
You were deliberating disregarding HAP from that calculation as you said it went to the landlord which is what Bronte was pointing out. Now your trying to sidestep that by pulling at heart strings.
The usual predictable 'round the house' posts that you bog down every thread you contribute to with
And many posters have since pointed out to you that your deliberately mis-interpreting that graphic. And your obviously continuing with that line.I didn't deliberately disregard anything. Quite the opposite actually, I pointed out how the graphic above paints a picture that is far from reality.
Probably around 97k excluding pension contributions by my calculationsHow much do you have to earn in Ireland to get 60K into your hand - rough figure will do.
Nor did I criticise that fact. But you'll criticise me for receiving HAP as a landlord housing people.
That is not what I asked you, this time with emphasis in bold.
she was not " targeted " !
...on a false premise, yes she was.
Emphasis was on "false", not on "target".
I take it you accept the graphic at start of topic is bogus.
Leave Mrs. Cash out of the entire thing if it makes you feel better. How much is a woman with 7 children entitled to from the taxpayer.
Same as every other woman with 7 children, no more no less.
http://www.citizensinformation.ie/e...milies_and_children/child_benefit.html#l1f4da
And what do I do with the extra money, I reinvest it back in to make the properties better.
But I was then left in an invidious position of seeing my properties lose value if I didn't increase due to the rent cap.
And you'd do the very same.
And you've entirely left out the higher taxes, the loss of mortgage interest relief,