Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 53,687
Well then get mad at the system rather than her. I absolutely do not agree with this individuals sense of entitlement when it comes to housing/benefits but they are merely working the system that we as a country have put in place.With all due respect David I think many people are already aware of the amount of money this person takes from the state from the free magic money tree. And rightly so , working people are agrieved at the lack of thanks from people like this who want to take more and more while contributing nothing. She has no shame so I don't think we can bring any more to bear on her.
Where's that from Brendan?
Brendan I feel putting this up is reckless and will only generate negativity towards an individual. Apart from what the media have reported there may be other issues at play with the fathers of the children.
With all due respect David I think many people are already aware of the amount of money this person takes from the state from the free magic money tree. And rightly so , working people are agrieved at the lack of thanks from people like this who want to take more and more while contributing nothing. She has no shame so I don't think we can bring any more to bear on her.
Hi David
The media and the campaigning groups focus on individual stories to generate publicity.
They are not interested in analysis, facts or stats. Just "mother of 7 forced to sleep in Garda Station"
Under the circumstances, I think it's perfectly appropriate to point out the benefits she is on.
Brendan
Very sad situation with no winners. Kids growing up in a terrible environment and destined for a similar life. No sign of the father(s). State picking up a massive tab.
Its all pretty low-brow stuff really.
1. The topic title is misleading, should read "this government..." not "the government".
2. Child benefit - she receives no more or no less per child than any other recipient in the State.
3. Fuel Allowance - doesn't she live in a b&b? Hard to see how she gets fuel allowance on a property that is not hers.
4. HAP - is it fair to say that it is the b&b that is in receipt of housing support payments?
5. Back to School Allowance is capped on income limits, including payments received from social welfare - in Ms Cash's instance, if she was in receipt of all the other welfare she would be disqualified from Back to school allowance.
like i said , commenting - criticising travelers has become one of the ultimate taboos amongst liberal society .
Its all pretty low-brow stuff really.
1. The topic title is misleading, should read "this government..." not "the government".
2. Child benefit - she receives no more or no less per child than any other recipient in the State.
3. Fuel Allowance - doesn't she live in a b&b? Hard to see how she gets fuel allowance on a property that is not hers.
4. HAP - is it fair to say that it is the b&b that is in receipt of housing support payments?
5. Back to School Allowance is capped on income limits, including payments received from social welfare - in Ms Cash's instance, if she was in receipt of all the other welfare she would be disqualified from Back to school allowance.