I hate both.
I usually say "There appears to be the option of a restful excursion at less than prohibitive costs according to this journal or periodical"
You must have learned that from the great
I hate both.
I usually say "There appears to be the option of a restful excursion at less than prohibitive costs according to this journal or periodical"
One that's been appearing quite a lot recently is people complaining about "wreckless" driving. I always thought that was a key objective when driving.
I dont understand this post, can you explain please? Are you saying that 'i before e except after c' is no longer applicable??Hate to wreck your buzz but they have actually don't teach the 'i' before 'e' rule anymore because there were way too many exceptions. It was a nice rhyme but that was about it!
I dont understand this post, can you explain please? Are you saying that 'i before e except after c' is no longer applicable??
I dont understand this post, can you explain please? Are you saying that 'i before e except after c' is no longer applicable??
Grammar conventions have changed even in the last 20 or 30 years - for example, for my father's generation, it was a big 'no no' to use can for permission: "Can I eat this?" as a kid, the answer I always got was "Well I'm sure you can, but if you are asking permission, then yes, you may" (usually delivered with a smug smirk)
However most authoritative grammar texts these days will list can, for permission, as legitimate, acceptable usage.
quote]
Oh this brought back memories-I remember a teacher in national school making some hapless child repeat 'can I...' over and over but not telling them that they wanted them to say 'may I..'
Grammar conventions have changed even in the last 20 or 30 years - for example, for my father's generation, it was a big 'no no' to use can for permission: "Can I eat this?" as a kid, the answer I always got was "Well I'm sure you can, but if you are asking permission, then yes, you may" (usually delivered with a smug smirk)
quote]
This used to happen in my house as well, brought back a few memories!
Grammar conventions have changed even in the last 20 or 30 years - for example, for my father's generation, it was a big 'no no' to use can for permission: "Can I eat this?" as a kid, the answer I always got was "Well I'm sure you can, but if you are asking permission, then yes, you may" (usually delivered with a smug smirk)
Maybe because effect is also a verb....Confusion between "effect" and "affect" is common. When I tell people that effect is a noun, and affect is a verb, I don't really think that helps.
That one usually does it for me - people referring to this country as some geographical abstraction.
The wife of a mate of mine is from Belfast and refers to their holiday home in Co. Donegal as being in The South (or Sythe as she pronounces it ). The actual location of the house is, geographically, further north that anywhere in the North, so how somewhere north of The North can be referred to as The Sythe is beyond me !
I don’t disagree – just pointing out that you may be confusing your friends by telling them that effect is a noun and affect is a verb. They may look at callybags’ example, assume her spelling is incorrect and conclude that we are all affecting a great debate here. And perhaps we are….OK, but most uses are as a noun:
......
By polite convention, one always travels UP to the capital, irrespective of one's geographical starting location relative to it. Hence, one always travels down to Cork, unless one has the misfortune to be from Cork, in which case one might travel DOWN to Dublin... always talking about going UP to Dublin.
By polite convention, one always travels UP to the capital, irrespective of one's geographical starting location relative to it.