They can add on the fees. This is the way things are done.
At present the only body who can enforce the JM is the original holder. If the original holder ceases to exist the JM is unenforceable. As for removal that may have to wait until 12 years from the judgement have elapsed.
For the new crowd to take over the JM they would have to go back to court and get the judgement in their name.
This is an area where solicitors can be very woolly in their answers. I had a case where a solicitor told a blatant lie to protect her client when a JM was challenged by an innocent party where a conflict of interest occurred. The law society were less than happy with the whole situation and the solicitor in question was severely punished.
At present the only body who can enforce the JM is the original holder. If the original holder ceases to exist the JM is unenforceable. As for removal that may have to wait until 12 years from the judgement have elapsed.
For the new crowd to take over the JM they would have to go back to court and get the judgement in their name.
This is an area where solicitors can be very woolly in their answers. I had a case where a solicitor told a blatant lie to protect her client when a JM was challenged by an innocent party where a conflict of interest occurred. The law society were less than happy with the whole situation and the solicitor in question was severely punished.