I agree that it's hard to determine and that ultimately the value of labour is determined by the return on capital. That's why I genuinely believe that the movement of capital to the Far East and the corresponding increase in wages and living standards is a good thing, even though it has happened to some extent at our expense (and indeed mine since I work in a a sector which is very exposed to Far Eastern manufacturing competition).It was an ambiguous question, like your one. It is exemplified by throwing another factor into the equation "sold in Germany" after the question is answered. I could easily add that it costs twice as much in wages in Norway to do my job. So how much is my labour worth now? Am I paid too much? Or too little?
In the long run the value of labour will determine the return on capital. The more incomes fall, the narrower the consumer base for highly profitable goods and services to be sold. This is what we are seeing today. The dilution of the purchasing power of labour corresponding with increases in asset values and capital investments.
Cracks are setting in, in Europe and the US.
the Far East and the corresponding increase in wages and living standards is a good thing,
even though it has happened to some extent at our expense (and indeed mine since I work in a a sector which is very exposed to Far Eastern manufacturing competition).
It is also why I don't understand where the notion comes from that pay levels should somehow be tied to the cost of living or what people need, or think they need, to live on.
While the Far East can compete aggressively on wages, it should be noted that this should result in cheaper prices? This has emerged not in the form of retail prices falling, but interest rates falling. It has never been so cheap (at corporate levels anyway) to borrow so much for so long.
And that is the problem as I see, an abundance of supply with diminished demand. Either countries, banks, corporates need to default or go bankrupt and start again, or inflation needs to kick in. Increasing wages will induce an inflationary effect.
True, to an extent, but how do we quantify it? Many people make things they can’t afford. Most people making luxury cars can’t afford them. I very much doubt that anyone making ships ever buys one.What is the point in producing a good if you cant afford it? Why teach someone the qualifications to a good career if you cant afford the product or service that is generated from that education? Why investigate a crime if you cant afford the rent on your home?
An income that provides a standard of living, or perceived standard of living, is a motivator to good work and services.
The cost of white goods, computers and electronics, TV’s, clothes, kids toys etc are far lower in real terms than they ever were. The same goes for things like cars. Those decreases relate directly to lower labour costs (or greater returns on capital).
True, to an extent, but how do we quantify it? Many people make things they can’t afford. Most people making luxury cars can’t afford them. I very much doubt that anyone making ships ever buys one.
The average income for a Garda in Ireland in the first two quarters of this year was €66,000 (plus a fantastic pension) so they certainly don’t have a problem affording their rent (obviously newly qualified ones do struggle but that is the case with every job).
But they have trickled down, just not in the West. 4 billion people have been lifted out of absolute poverty in the last 20 years. We need to look at the bigger picture.Point accepted. A combination of lower prices and low interest rates has led to an abundance or over supply of goods. Prices however did not fall to their true value as they were supported by a massive credit expansion. Now that that bubble has burst it is Central Banks propping up the void by a further credit expansion (QE) in the hope of creating a wealth effect that will "trickle down" to the population at large despite the evidence of a trickle up effect instead.
Agreed, my comment above notwithstanding.I was talking in general terms. People have made sacrifices in terms of job losses and pay cuts. But as the economy recovers, then those sacrifices should begin to reverse. Arguably they are, but at a slower pace than accepted or is expected.
I agree. They would have strong public support if they concentrated on those issues instead of pay and stopped telling lies about what they get paid.Also it is my understanding that the dispute reaches beyond pay rates. Lack of investment in technology, lack of resources to investigate, prosecute, unending resources allocated to minor petty crimes while more serious crimes are not investigated properly, has led to a general demise in moral and confidence in the Gardai and in particular, its senior management.
Only getting to this now. I quite like Holland actually. I know a few people from there and others who have worked there. Seems like an ideal place to live. Space is a bit tight in urban areas but they have a very high standard of living.Most of Europe and parts of the USA.
I like Holland too. They can be a bit cold though.Only getting to this now. I quite like Holland actually. I know a few people from there and others who have worked there. Seems like an ideal place to live. Space is a bit tight in urban areas but they have a very high standard of living.
That's utter nonsense. The media are very sympathetic to the Public Sector as most of the media is heavily unionised and the State Broadcaster is effectively Public Sector as the employees are effectively unsackable and have defined benefit pensions. There is a desire by some people not to see Public sector pay return to boom time levels which were unsustainable even during a credit fuelled, capital tax funded windfall. The State simply can’t afford it. If you want pay increases then increase productivity and resuce numbers by a corresponding amount. If you want pay increases then divide the existing pay bill amongst fewer people who are working in more efficient organisations. It is the people working in the Public Sector who should be leading that change instead of waiting for “the gubberment” to tell you what to do.There is an obvious attempt by the government, and the media, to claim that people working in the PS should remain on recession level salaries in order to fund the public services, when of course all citizens should be required to fund public services.
What, specifically, are you referring to?You have the likes of Eddie Hobbs spouting half truths about pensions, as much designed to cover up the poor performance of the private sector as anything else.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?