Re: Key Post: Investment in Irish Forestry Funds
extopia said:
As I understand it, the receipt of these EU and government grants and premia funds is one of the main attractions of the Forestry Funds. Are you saying such premia are not recognised as income by the funds?
I'm careful not to say anything specific without having studied the accounts in detail but my (possibly simplistic) understanding is that
- the purchase of the land on which the trees are planted is financed by the investors' initial investments (as one would expect)
- the planting of the land is 100% grant-aided by the State so there is no cost to the fund or its investors.
- this 100% grant aid also covers the first four years maintenance of the plantations
- the annual forestry premiums are being eaten up in total by the management fees and other running costs (a large element of which is being paid to entities owned or controlled by the promoters or people close to them).
Professional forestry people would say in general that, 4 years after planting, a forest plantation is fully established and that incidental costs of management and insurance are small. Hence an investor in receipt of annual forestry premiums (even the 'non-farmer' rate receivable by the Funds) should expect to enjoy a significant 'dividend' on the investment, arising from the difference between the amount of the premium and the annual management costs.
In the case of the Funds, one would expect that if the management fees and running costs had been subjected to independent tendering process, these costs would have been expected to approximate to the median rates in the industry (or a tad lower when the benefits of economies of scale are taken into account). On this basis, the annual premium income should significantly exceed the running costs.
This appears not to be the case in relation to the Funds, and investors should ask themselves why they are not enjoying such a 'dividend'.
Unfortunately as they only have non-voting preference shares, they have no formal mechanism to hold management to account on this and other issues.
I share the concerns listed above, by the way, about the fact that investors have no voting rights and therefore can't have a say in making sure that the forestry management contracts are put out to tender (e.g.) on the open market.
I would actually be more worried by the absence of any shareholder influence over the timing and operation of the process of disposal of the forest properties at the conclusion of the investment term.