Touché!A little gift wrap for you two!
Obviously the understanding of the phrase 'parallel universe' and who actually lives in the real one passed you by
Touché!A little gift wrap for you two!
Obviously the understanding of the phrase 'parallel universe' and who actually lives in the real one passed you by
It sounds like something written by the People's Front of Judea.https://louisallday.wordpress.com/2018/04/01/israel-the-semantics-of-propaganda/
Here is an alternative view, albeit referencing UK and US media I think it can be applied to Irish media reporting on Palestinian and Israel.
The article outlines the view that far from portraying Israel as the aggressor or the bad guy, that the media in fact use language that portrays Israel as the perpetual victim.
I think the article has merit.
It sounds like something written by the People's Front of Judea.
In Ireland Hamas combatants are referred to as "Fighters" not as "Terrorists" even though the EU regards Hamas as a terrorist organisation. Semantics me This post will be deleted if not edited to remove bad language, as they say.
In Ireland we are cravenly pro-LBGT and yet we ignore the horrific treatment of members of the LGBT community in Gaza. In Israel a LGBT Arab man or women can live openly, join the military and advocate for their community.
I agree with everything you said Sunny. I started this thread to talk about how Israel gets so much attention but its neighbours, who are far worse, get so little. So far the vast majority of the posts are about Israel and what it does wrong. My first post asked why we ignore what is going on in Turkey, what's going on in Saudi Arabia.
Would there be calls for a boycott of the Eurovision if it was being held in Turkey?
What do we know about how Africans are treated in Saudi?
I'm not excusing Israels behaviour; it is further away from the ideals of a real liberal democracy now than at any point in the last 70 years. I am just questioning why our media refuses to contextualise what it does and why it doesn't report on other countries in the region to the same extent.
I started this thread to talk about how Israel gets so much attention but its neighbours, who are far worse, get so little. So far the vast majority of the posts are about Israel and what it does wrong. My first post asked why we ignore what is going on in Turkey, what's going on in Saudi Arabia.
I am just questioning why our media refuses to contextualise what it does and why it doesn't report on other countries in the region to the same extent.
Over here, we seem to shrug our shoulders and say almost go 'that's the Arab's for you'.... With Israel it seems to be a bit different.
I would disagree. Haven't you heard of Gadaffi, "The Butchers of Bagdad", "Animal Assad"? These are all countries in which Western powers have toppled or tried to topple, precisely because of what they do.
Anyone following events in the Middle East will know that Iran is now also being targeted for economic sanctions...what economic sanctions are there against Israel?
Perhaps the perceived bias in reporting against Israel stems from the fact that Israel is never held to account for anything it does.
Are you seriously suggesting that they were overthrown because of how they treated their own people?Haven't you heard of Gadaffi, "The Butchers of Bagdad", "Animal Assad"? These are all countries in which Western powers have toppled or tried to topple, precisely because of what they do
Again, is that because of how they treat their people or is it because they are in a cold war with Saudi Arabia and the Saudis underwrite the US Dollar as their world's reserve currency?Anyone following events in the Middle East will know that Iran is now also being targeted for economic sanctions...what economic sanctions are there against Israel?
How do you square that with this?;Perhaps the perceived bias in reporting against Israel stems from the fact that Israel is never held to account for anything it does.
The other point is what influence does Western media and reporting have on the state policies of Arab countries? I would say very little. So we can protest all we want about LGBT rights in Palestine, SA, Iran or Qatar or wherever...unless it puts political pressure on those governments then it just goes by the wayside.
Relative to Saudi Arabia Iran is a bastion of freedom, tolerance and peacefulness.Iran had sanctions imposed for years yet still threatened Israel with nuclear destruction while working towards creating nuclear weapons. Even when sanctions were removed after the nuclear deal, look how many western countries were piling into Iran despite no regime change and despite horrendous human rights record. The reason why there is such acrimony towards Trump's decision is the lost business that the deal brought. Not because people thought it was a great deal. Trump is right. It is a poor deal but it was probably the best deal that could have been got at the time.
Relative to Saudi Arabia Iran is a bastion of freedom, tolerance and peacefulness.
Only reason they were toppled is that the US attitude to the Middle East changed after 9/11 and society changes.
Iran had sanctions imposed for years
Are you seriously suggesting that they were overthrown because of how they treated their own people?
That would be true if they were being replaced with better governments, or any governments. It would be true if "we" were backing the side which was less abusive. It would be true if the most abusive country of all, which is also the biggest sponsor of terrorism, received any sanctions at all. Instead there are thousands of US Marines and a carrier battle fleet there protecting the absolute monarchy which rules it.What matters is that those regimes, and others, were/are and being held to account through economic sanctions, military strikes, outright invasions.
That would be true if they were being replaced with better governments, or any governments. It would be true if "we" were backing the side which was less abusive. It would be true if the most abusive country of all, which is also the biggest sponsor of terrorism, received any sanctions at all. Instead there are thousands of US Marines and a carrier battle fleet there protecting the absolute monarchy which rules it.
The Fox News type pro-Israeli media don't report on the bad things that Israel do and vilify the other side and the Guardian type "liberal" media seem to do the opposite. We don't have the equivalent of the Fox News type media here.I dont dispute that. There appears to be a correlation between the political and media treatment of Middle East regimes that chime with Western (or rather US) interests and those that dont.
We don't have the equivalent of the Fox News type media here
We can agree on that!Thank God for that.
I did see something on RTE about it but no editorials.I disagree with your opposite analogy, albeit this is just my perception - if Hamas had targeted and killed an Israeli volunteer medic, a Fox news type media would be outraged and baying for revenge.
Other than the reporting of the events of that tragedy, I dont see any editorials, commentary in the Irish media condemning Israel or seeking revenge, do you?
You can't be seriousI see the leader of the British Labour Party, Mr. Corbyn, is getting in trouble because he placed a wreath at a monument commemorating the PLO terrorists who murdered the Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics.
Because the majority of the media are left wing themselvesWhy is the media ire here reserved for the extremists on the right when their counterparts on the left are equally unsavoury and dangerous?