TheBigShort
Registered User
- Messages
- 2,789
Okay, so Where did I suggest there was an anti-Jewish conspiracy?
You do know the difference between a conspiracy and a bias, right?
another plethora of comments and answers in which you set yourself up as the righteous inquisitor en chief focusing on the ever more minute dissection of specific examples rather than the bigger picture discussion.
Gaza is under siege by Israel and Egypt. If either party lifted their bit of the siege then the blockade would be over. Where are the protests on the Egyptian border? Where are the opinion pieces about how the Egyptians are treating their Arab brothers and sisters?
Good.I will glady accept that you do not consider there to be a conspiracy in the media against Israel on the basis that it has something to do with it being Jewish, but rather there is only a bias.
Please see my first post.So other than your speculative assumption that there is bias, do you have anything else to back up that assumption?
Please see my first post.
What do you mean, hold the Arabs to the same standards as white\westernized people???
Thats somewhat odd to say the least?
It is white/westernised people that have been plundering the Arab world for the last century. Carving up regions and wealth, overthrowing democratically elected governments, imposing regime change under false pretences, imposing crippling economic sanctions against governments that dont toe the line, getting into bed with governments that do - regardless of their human rights abuses.
And no-one is ever held to account.
The only standard set by Western governments in the Middle East is, "what is best for our self-interest", that is all.
So it's ok then for Arab goverments to do whatever they want? Without criticism?
Arab governments are conducting human rights abuses but you won't criticise them only any western allies they might have?
What standard do Arab governments set?
I condemn all governments that engage in systematic and/or deliberate human rights abuses regardless of their ethnicity, religion or any other defining characteristic. Regardless of whether that is the Irish government, UK, France, US, Israel, Russia, Iran, China, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Syria or whoever.
Do you?
However, this topic is not about me. Instead it is about an alleged, or perceived bias in the Irish media.
I would accept that there appears to be more coverage of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict than other conflicts although that is just my perception.
I am a long way from thinking that there is bias against Israel, let alone that if it does exist that it has anything to do with being Jewish.
There is a blatant anti Israel bias in the mainstream Irish media
Clearly without a doubt Israel are held to a standard that does not apply to their neighbours.
B/S that's a long list of bad guys. I think I asked you this before but which society/nation do you admire and wish us to follow?
On what basis have come to this view?
Is the price of protest to be shot dead?
Israel can only consider itself to be held to a 'higher standard' when it is accountable for its abuses. It is not accountable. Its perceived higher accountability probably stems from the fact that it relies on international support from EU, Russia and primarily US for its continued existence. As I mentioned before, if the populations of Europe, particularly UK and France, and the population of US turns on its political establishments to put the Palestinian/Israel conflict at the top of the agenda, then the very existence of Israel could be in jeopardy.
That is why I believe mostly that the Palestinian/Israel conflict receives more attention in ours (and other Western countries) than other conflicts occurring in the world.
On the basis of paying attention to the world and the Irish media's reaction to it for the last 20 - 30 years.
It was not a peaceful protest. If they don't want to get shot don't start a riot beside armed soldiers, that advice, cynical as it may be, applies to anywhere in the Middle East.
There is a blatant anti Israel bias in the mainstream Irish media. Clearly without a doubt Israel are held to a standard that does not apply to their neighbours.
I think some of it is anti-western, and some of it is anti-semitic and some of it is naive, in that people don't seem to realise that a country with free press will have more critical information about a government coming to light, and that a country with an unfree one will cover up and hide their actions. So yes Western governments should be criticised when it is justified, but we should also remember that sometimes non-Western governments are much better at pulling the wool over the eyes of journalists and their own people.
Israel might not like it but the fact of the matter is that are an occupying force in Gaza. They mightn't agree and you mightn't agree but the UN says they are and most of the international community says they are. And being an occupying force has responsibilities towards civilian populations whether they like it or not. Terrorist attacks are deplorable and Israel has a right to defend itself but that right doesn't permit any country to stand on ordinary people's civil liberties and unless you are telling me that every man woman and child in the Gaza strip is a terrorist, there are civilians suffering because of the actions of their own leaders and the actions of Israel. Having sympathy for them doesn't mean you are anti-Israel. The brutal truth is that it is pointless looking to Hamas to protect their own by doing the right thing so we have to look to Israel to be bigger, to be better, to be calmer, to be more constructive, to be more honest, to be fairer, to be more responsible. Mightn't be fair on Israel but not much in the world is actually fair.
It is a form of bias and a double standard from the media.
But, the perception they create with this unfairness is that Iran et al is not doing anything that should be criticised, and that only Israel is.
I must be living in a parallel universe..
LOLYou're only realising that now?
You're only realising that now?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?