House Market Weakening?

Status
Not open for further replies.
260k is over 8x gross salary but she has a spare bedroom .

If she is on €850 repayments that is probably an interest only €260k mortgage at 4% interest or is she paying €850+€320 =€1170 which indicates repayment.

If she does not need a car but has one anyway then that could go if necessary .
 
2Pack said:
260k is over 8x gross salary but she has a spare bedroom .

If she is on €850 repayments that is probably an interest only €260k mortgage at 4% interest or is she paying €850+€320 =€1170 which indicates repayment.

If she does not need a car but has one anyway then that could go if necessary .
Yes, it's an interest only mortgage and those figures quoted are about right. She does drive (a very nice sporty Renault Megané may I add) which required a motor loan when she bought it two years ago. That's €3-4K sunk into the car every year. Even if she could live without it, she said in no uncertain terms that she could never lower herself to take a bus. You also have to remember that raising a three year old kiddie doesn't come cheap either, probably another (€3-4K after benefits). Remember, she's just a glorified secretary, her salary won't be going up anytime soon.

Am I the only one that thinks that this girl has gotten herself into a very precarious situation?
 
Wonder if we should have a new thread tracking the movement towards the exits ?

We've had had AIB and BOI disposing of significant property portfolios.
We've had HOK selling out to Savills, UK.
We've had HARRINGTON Bannon selling out to Atisreal.

Further to this in today's Indo:

We are beginning to see early signs that ultra high-net worth clients in Ireland and, to a lesser extent, high-net worth
clients are beginning to move away from real estate, diversify and reallocate assets.

The smart money is beginning to reduce its allocation to real estate
 
Raskolnikov said:
Am I the only one that thinks that this girl has gotten herself into a very precarious situation?
No you are not and Is she the ONLY one in Ireland who won't listen to advice, why NO !

Her payments will go up another 50% to around €1300 over the next few years. ( I said I EXPECT 6% mortgage rates by c.2008 or 5% base rates ) Her salary and her rental income will not go up 50% .

Then again her childcare costs will drop soon as sprog goes to school but she loses the €1000 childcare allowance she will soon get.

I assume she needed to run a megane for some reason and not the oul 1995 Micra but seeing as new meganes depreciate as all renaults do she is probably in negative equity on the yoke already and may as well keep the feckin thing :D
 
Raskolnikov said:
Am I the only one that thinks that this girl has gotten herself into a very precarious situation?

It definitely looks like she is highly exposed! A creche alone will cost her a small fortune! I'm not sure I follow her logic on the house going up €20k. She is paying €14k a year on the interest only mortgage, unless she is making more than that a year in appreciation she is still losing money!
 
Looks like the Banks, are looking for bag-holders while the smart money exits stage left. If they are so confident in their predictions they will no doubt be happy to give a guarantee that they will indemnify anyone who gets into negative equity. If they are unwilling to back up their forecasts with hard cash (their stock in trade) they are willfully lying.
 
Sorry if this is a stupid question Duplex, but is it likely they would indemnify against negative equity and if so how would they do this?

I agree about the comment about the bank looking for bag holders while the high net worth groups exit stage left :)
 
micheller said:
Sorry if this is a stupid question Duplex, but is it likely they would indemnify against negative equity and if so how would they do this?

I agree about the comment about the bank looking for bag holders while the high net worth groups exit stage left :)

Not a chance
 
micheller said:
Sorry if this is a stupid question Duplex, but is it likely they would indemnify against negative equity and if so how would they do this?

I agree about the comment about the bank looking for bag holders while the high net worth groups exit stage left :)

Not a cat's chance in hell
 
micheller said:
Sorry if this is a stupid question Duplex, but is it likely they would indemnify against negative equity and if so how would they do this?

I agree about the comment about the bank looking for bag holders while the high net worth groups exit stage left :)


Micheller, as the banks are offering advice such as


We wouldn't be advising FTBs to ever hold off buying."

(To quote Niall O’Grady Head of Marketingwith Permanent TSB.)

I think it would not seem unreasonable for any FTB to request a guarantee from PTSB; that in the highly unlikely event that the property market crashes, that the bank will pay the difference between the original purchase price and the ahhh…… new lower price if the FTB’er sells.

It may be my cynical disposition, but I have difficulty in believing the utterances of banks, much less the honeyed words of heads of marketing. Mr O’ Grady seems happy to make unsubstantiated statements that will influence the course of people’s lives, surely it would not be asking much if he or his bank backed up their words with cash.

Money talks, bulls**t walks, so to speak. ;)
 
2Pack said:
NORMAL GERMAN Interest Rates, not emergency rates as in post 9/11 . I would expect base rate 5% which equals 6% Mortgage rate and by 2008. I am not predicting higher in this strenghtening cycle.
2Pack

I'm not so sure about your analysis of where interest rates are going to go in the next couple of years. I agree that the current interest rate is too low and that we are likely to see rises but I think it is far too pessimistic to assume that they are going to reach 5% (you can remind me of this if it happens).

Looking at the recent experience of the UK, it only took a rise of 1.25% to take the wind out of the housing market there and slow the economy enough that the central bank started to drop rates again and, although there is a suggestion that rates may rise again soon there, it will not be by much. That in a an economy with almost full employment and rapid economic growth over the last few years.

Contrast that to the European economy where growth is sluggish at best and the unemployment rate is ~9%. There is still no sign of any large inflationary pressures apart from energy prices and little scope for wage demands given the competition from abroad. Add to that the strengthening euro and the 3% increase in VAT rates in Germany next year and these are the equivalent of adding a certain amount to the interest rate without any move by the ECB. Taking all this into consideration I think that the chance of rates rising as far as 5% is very low.

I don't think that a rate rise to this degree will be enough to cause a collapse in the housing market. A lot has been said on this site about the fact that people will start panic-selling their properties as soon as they stop going up in value. From talking to 'investors' who have bought properties in the past few years - including those who are losing money on the rental income - even if prices drop, they will not sell up as they believe in property as a way to 'secure the future' and that it will always eventually go up in value. It will take a major external shock for the property market to collapse in Ireland. That's not to say it will not happen but there are too many vested interests out there keeping the whole thing afloat to let it fall (including the 85% of Irish households that own their own home).

The reported 300,000 properties lying vacant around the state attest to the fact that Irish people don't look at property in the traditional sense in terms of returns and yields but as some kind of cash cow for future retirement or to give to the kids.

I'm starting to believe that the likely outcome of all this will be a slow decrease in ther rate of HPI to a rate below inflation which will feel like a nice soft landing to everyone but no crash.

That said, I've no intention of buying myself in the near future so what does that mean?
 
Did anyone else hear Berie getting v. hot under the collar when questioned by Joe higgins today. He sounded like a very upset man at the housing market being criticised!
 
gearoidmm said:
2Pack

I'm not so sure about your analysis of where interest rates are going to go in the next couple of years. I agree that the current interest rate is too low and that we are likely to see rises but I think it is far too pessimistic to assume that they are going to reach 5% (you can remind me of this if it happens).
I won't remind you you know.

Looking at the recent experience of the UK, it only took a rise of 1.25% to take the wind out of the housing market there and slow the economy enough that the central bank started to drop rates again and, although there is a suggestion that rates may rise again soon there, it will not be by much. That in a an economy with almost full employment and rapid economic growth over the last few years.
Good point that. I had factored it in slightly. I would say the UK Central bank made LOTS of dire threats and SOME rate rises thrown in. The combination of BOTH eased the market _in case_ they went further. The ECB is afraid to threaten and must be judged on action alone. To get the same effect they will overshoot the rise cycle . Well played the UK !
Contrast that to the European economy where growth is sluggish at best and the unemployment rate is ~9%. There is still no sign of any large inflationary pressures apart from energy prices and little scope for wage demands given the competition from abroad. Add to that the strengthening euro and the 3% increase in VAT rates in Germany next year and these are the equivalent of adding a certain amount to the interest rate without any move by the ECB. Taking all this into consideration I think that the chance of rates rising as far as 5% is very low.
I feel the base rate will NOT need to go above 5% but would feel that stress testing to around that level is prudent. Base rate 5% = Mortgage rate 6% of course.

The problem in Europe is that if the ECB is seen as NOT serious about inflation the Euro could drop on sentiment which will then import inflation. Then they are in a "react to external pressure mode "and could have to tighten alarmingly to get taken "seriously" again. As fuel prices rose so did the Euro so we did not get the full oil price shock unlike the US. If sentiment turns against the Euro they could overtake 5% base to get taken seriously. Remember the euro was a basket case currency before 911 and Duisenbergs ECB was a joke, they will not willingly go there again .

I feel they must keep the euro where it is now as a consequence.
I don't think that a rate rise to this degree will be enough to cause a collapse in the housing market. A lot has been said on this site about the fact that people will start panic-selling their properties as soon as they stop going up in value.
I do feel that the new (post .com) investor who piled in post 2001 emergency rates and stamp duty lift will exit. I feel older investors (pre 2000) will not pile out. Some area on the peripheries like Kilbeggan or Carlow or Gorey will suffer most and the downswing will be asymettrical not universal.
From talking to 'investors' who have bought properties in the past few years - including those who are losing money on the rental income - even if prices drop, they will not sell up as they believe in property as a way to 'secure the future' and that it will always eventually go up in value.
Well they are wrong if they can remember 1980-1987 at all and if not they should find out about it.
It will take a major external shock for the property market to collapse in Ireland. That's not to say it will not happen but there are too many vested interests out there keeping the whole thing afloat to let it fall (including the 85% of Irish households that own their own home).
I take issue with this bit only, are you saying that 85% of Irish homes have no outstanding loans secured on them....at all ????
The reported 300,000 properties lying vacant around the state attest to the fact that Irish people don't look at property in the traditional sense in terms of returns and yields but as some kind of cash cow for future retirement or to give to the kids.
Now yes, I also believe that sentiment turns and new realities become accepted ....and sometimes very quickly.

Its not that we disagree or that we agree GM but that we see things somewhat differently my friend and model our economic scenarios differently as a consequence. I give 'sentiment' and turns in 'sentiment' a weighting in my models but you see I was in England in 1988 and also in 1991 and 1993 . :D
 
gearoidmm said:
A lot has been said on this site about the fact that people will start panic-selling their properties as soon as they stop going up in value. From talking to 'investors' who have bought properties in the past few years - including those who are losing money on the rental income - even if prices drop, they will not sell up as they believe in property as a way to 'secure the future' and that it will always eventually go up in value.

It's all well and good saying that now when prices are motoring ahead, but if prices start falling then why stay in it? Why not sell up, bank a profit and buy back in at the bottom of the cycle again?

It's easy to "believe" in any investment when everythings running sweet. I'm sure there were plenty of believers in the "new paradigm" of tech stocks pre-2000.

Cold harsh reality has a nasty habit of challenging peoples beliefs.
 
Excuse my ignorance, but when people say a house price crash, what exactly constitutes a crash? Negative equity on homes? An actual fall in valuation of a property in real terms?
 
A "crash" in a market, any market, is when there's a sudden change in sentiment, usually following some period of speculative boom where prices were bid ever higher and higher in a sellers market where buyers had little or no power to wrangle a discount. The price crash happens when something triggers the herd to suddenly all move the other direction, this time the market is characterised by a rush of sellers piling up to exit the market, with not a buyer in sight. Buyers will grudgingly bite, but will only accept a much bigger discount off the last transaction, hoping that their transaction marks the bottom. In a crash, sellers are only glad to oblige a discount and off load their product for fear of further losses. As the bust accelerates and fear takes over, ever greater and greater discounts are sought and achieved by buyers. Crashes have the further attribute of seeming to appear overnight.

Does that explain it?
 
walk2dewater said:
A "crash" in a market, any market, is when there's a sudden change in sentiment, usually following some period of speculative boom where prices were bid ever higher and higher in a sellers market where buyers had little or no power to wrangle a discount. The price crash happens when something triggers the herd to suddenly all move the other direction, this time the market is characterised by a rush of sellers piling up to exit the market, with not a buyer in sight. Buyers will grudgingly bite, but will only accept a much bigger discount off the last transaction, hoping that their transaction marks the bottom. In a crash, sellers are only glad to oblige a discount and off load their product for fear of further losses. As the bust accelerates and fear takes over, ever greater and greater discounts are sought and achieved by buyers. Crashes have the further attribute of seeming to appear overnight.

Does that explain it?

Now I know:D
 
walk2dewater said:
A "crash" in a market, any market, is when there's a sudden change in sentiment, usually following some period of speculative boom where prices were bid ever higher and higher in a sellers market where buyers had little or no power to wrangle a discount. The price crash happens when something triggers the herd to suddenly all move the other direction, this time the market is characterised by a rush of sellers piling up to exit the market, with not a buyer in sight. Buyers will grudgingly bite, but will only accept a much bigger discount off the last transaction, hoping that their transaction marks the bottom. In a crash, sellers are only glad to oblige a discount and off load their product for fear of further losses. As the bust accelerates and fear takes over, ever greater and greater discounts are sought and achieved by buyers. Crashes have the further attribute of seeming to appear overnight.

Does that explain it?

Does this kind of thing happen in property though? It's not a very liquid market. When sentiment changes are 300,000 people all going to rush at once to their real estate agent and demand that they sell their property immediately?

Even if they do, where will the buyers come from? Sensing a change in sentiment why would you be in a hurry to buy a house? More likely potential buyers will be happy to wait hoping to force the sellers ever lower as more and more properties are put up for sale. Sellers themselves may be reluctant to book a loss on their "investment" and insist on holding out for a higher price rather than selling at below the market price.

I think it will be months if not years before the full reality of a crash becomes apparent.
 
It's happened/happening in Hong Kong, Bangkok, Finland, Spain, Cyprus and Japan. Bubbles burst or they're not bubbles. The US is on the brink with many areas already starting to see falls. How can property prices fall by 70% in Japan, a country which is more densely populated than Ireland and where during much of the crash, interest rates were lower than the current Euro base rate?

http://www.bangkokrecorder.com/?p=redakt.artikel_detail&ID=24&ArtikelID=100

The market value is set by the latest transaction evidence, if someone wants to believe that their property is worth more than what the market will pay, well they'll have to wait until the market agrees with them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top