LDFerguson
Registered User
- Messages
- 4,717
There's a funny quote in that same Indo article from some 'financial adviser' called Liam Ferguson. I'm glad he's not on any panel of 'experts'!
"Come on, lads - into the breach." (Encouraging Property Pin regulars to post on an AAM thread.)
"F***ing moron." (Intelligent criticism of David Duffy on hearing he is on the debt committee.)
"He might know about trackers but he knows f*** all about honesty and being fair. Pri**" (Intelligent criticism of Brendan Burgess.)
"I emailed Pat Kenny's programme about this and included some posts from Brendan. I suggest others do the same if they get a chance. Nothing may come of it but you'd never know and it would be great to get this c*** [DV - rhymes with "stunt"] sacked before this group even gets started."
However, I do find it odd - and forgive me if I'm misreading people - that a public figure, who has been appointed to a government body based partly on their leadership of this forum, cannot be criticised in an adult manner based on things they have said on this forum or, or indeed, elsewhere in the media.
This is an example of what I'm talking about. UFC chooses to be anonymous and criticises Brendan because he didn't predict the property crash, thus inferring that he (UFC) was somehow able to predict it.
Yet we have no way of knowing whether or not this is valid. For all we know, UFC predicted double-digit growth in Irish property prices in 2009, but can now change his tune to suit an argument.
It doesn't matter what you think of me or who I am, what's important is Brendan was unable to see and (more importantly) was unable to heed the advice of economists who said we were in the middle of an obvious bubble.
Nobody had the courage to stand up to what was clearly a government/financial industry (note industry, not just banks!) to profit at the behest of the general public.
I believe Brendan Burgess is as much open to criticism as the next man. But I also believe that some fairness must apply. Suggesting that he's incompetent because he openly admits that he didn't predict the price crash is unfair unless we have proof that the person doing the criticising actually did predict the crash. As distinct from revising their story after the event. And I discount economists who predicted a property price crash for many years before it happened. If you keep on predicting the fall or rise in any asset class, eventually you'll be right.
Both of these are a very dangerous combination and makes me very worried he will be able to influence billions of our tax money.
On the same lines, it is possible to predict that in an economy where house prices keep rising way over the corresponding average increase in incomes, while the growth in jobs outside of construction is static, there is what is commonly known as a property bubble and eventually there will be a problem. Discounting this opinion is as unwise as discounting the aforementioned doctor.
It doesn't matter what you think of me or who I am...
He is not exactly going to be Minister of Finance. He is one part of a panel that if history is to be repeated will do up a report and will then be ignored.
So what if he did or didn't get it right on property prices? Are we saying that only people who called the crisis can have any influence on any sort of Government policy in this Country going forward?
All very easy to predict now isn't it.
............was unable to heed the advice of economists who said we were in the middle of an obvious bubble.
Actually it matters an awful lot. For all we know, you could be criticising Brendan because
(a) you have a vested interest in this committee not having Brendan Burgess on it.
(b) you have a large financial interest in property which is served by your arguments
Etc.
As I said, you could have been predicting double-digit Irish property increases in 2009 for all we know.
It is easy to pick the winning horse after the race. Identifying the economists that were right as the ones that should have been heeded as opposed to all the economists who got it wrong undermines the understanding of the high level of risk and volatility in markets. It is not simple to read, if it was you would take every penny you have and back those economist's next prediction.
It is easy to pick the winning horse after the race.
I agree with you that there is a good chance their findings will be ignored, but they may not be, and that is why I think this is serious. And we're talking about XX,000,000,000+ euros.
His inability to see we were in an bubble and his inability to listen to other people's opinions are the exact sort of reasons why this country is screwed. Therefore I do not think maintaining the status quo is right for Ireland.
The Government is not going to announce a multi billion euro bail out plan for householders in negative equity. Why the hell would you think they would?
What is link between his views on house prices and helping people deal with personal debt?
...and who certainly aren't tainted with the "vested interest" label.
He is one part of a panel that if history is to be repeated will do up a report and will then be ignored.
My understanding of this is that we are not going to talk for 18 months and then write a report.These experts will work within Government and present their recommendations on a rolling basis to the Minister for Finance, for consideration by Government. The work will commence immediately.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?