@Purple In relation to state services, you are right about inefficient and ineffective processes but the main problem is not the processes but rather the large numbers of staff (not all) who contribute almost nothing to these processes and are still un touchable in their employment.
I think it was James Reilly who made this point quite well when asked why he wasnt reforming the health service as promised. His respomse was that 80% of the budget related to the cost of staff and in terms of the staff in place, they were untouchable regardless of their performance. So even though the service needs lots more front line staff, there is no budget to hire them as the payroll is already being spent on swathes of unsuitable employees who contribute very little.
The solution is not to spend more on the health service but to weed out the rot and replace it with people who possess the skills needed.
Main problem is political will, employment law and unions. Same problem throughout the public service too.
I think it was James Reilly who made this point quite well when asked why he wasnt reforming the health service as promised. His respomse was that 80% of the budget related to the cost of staff and in terms of the staff in place, they were untouchable regardless of their performance. So even though the service needs lots more front line staff, there is no budget to hire them as the payroll is already being spent on swathes of unsuitable employees who contribute very little.
The solution is not to spend more on the health service but to weed out the rot and replace it with people who possess the skills needed.
Main problem is political will, employment law and unions. Same problem throughout the public service too.