quarterfloun said:It's better than watching endless repeats of the Simpsons though.......
ronan_d_john said:It's not. They're from the United Kingdom. Why should people be allowed in from a foreign country in order to protest on our streets. Why not allow the Pakistani people who are protesting against those cartoons in Karachi to come in here and protest against The Star?
It's ridiculous, and further pandering by Bertie Ahern to the Unionist population in Northern Ireland.
Ably supported it seems by Labour at the moment - has anyone seen their ridiculous notion of including the British army in any rememberances of 1916. Any for seeing some of the Wehrmacht or the Luftwaffe rocking up to the War Memorial in London on Poppy Day??????
I specifically meant that it was a very dangerous argument from the point of view of mitigating or abrogating everybody's right to free speech and giving in to incipient latent or actual bullying/threats.car said:A very dangerous argument indeed as it implies the authorities wouldnt be able to control any such trouble, but I feel the threat is very real in this instance that trouble will indeed happen.
ronan_d_john said:They're from the United Kingdom.
Wrong. The state and a majority of its citizens (as evidenced by the changes to articles 2 and 3 of the Constitution a while back) do indeed recognise partition:extopia said:They are from the northern part of Ireland. Not everyone recognises the partition of the island. And neither does the State.
Article 3
1. It is the firm will of the Irish Nation, in harmony and friendship, to unite all the people who share the territory of the island of Ireland, in all the diversity of their identities and traditions, recognising that a united Ireland shall be brought about only by peaceful means with the consent of a majority of the people, democratically expressed, in both jurisdictions in the island. Until then, the laws enacted by the Parliament established by this Constitution shall have the like area and extent of application as the laws enacted by the Parliament that existed immediately before the coming into operation of this Constitution.
2. Institutions with executive powers and functions that are shared between those jurisdictions may be established by their respective responsible authorities for stated purposes and may exercise powers and functions in respect of all or any part of the island.
ClubMan said:Which means to label the ones who decline the article 2 offer foreigners is correct.
Many inhabitants of NI don't consider themselves Irish (in the sense that they belong to the "Irish Nation" mentioned above) and reject any attribution of such an interpretation of Irishness to them.extopia said:I'm of the opinion that people born in Ireland (either jurisdiction) are Irish. I do not regard Irish people as foreigners, even if they do not have a passport.
Personally I'm neutral on it and neither welcome nor shun them. It makes no odds to me either way. Unless they head to Dalyer for a pint afterwards where I would welcome them.To get back to the original question, as far as I'm concerned the lads in the bowler hats are welcome to come down and introduce us to some of their traditions, which are of course all part of the weave of Irish cultural activity.
I was being sarcastic Ronan. Adopting the attitude that it's nice to see our northern countrymen in the capital would not please them.It's not. They're from the United Kingdom. Why should people be allowed in from a foreign country in order to protest on our streets.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?