Indeed; but show me where I said the OP should walk out?
The OP has stated they have dependents, so in my view the very least they should do at this point is start looking for another job.
Indeed; but show me where I said the OP should walk out?We know nothing of the OP's situation (mortgage, outgoings etc.) or their prospects of getting similar work
Post #10, point 3...look for another jobIndeed; but show me where I said the OP should walk out?
The OP has stated they have dependents, so in my view the very least they should do at this point is start looking for another job.
Please don't insult or patronise.Ah here!
I'll be charitable and assume English isn't your first language.
Step 1: You look for another job
By one or more of the following steps
a. You contact recruitment agencies.b. You answer job advertisements.c. You update your LinkedIn / webpage / online profiled. You contact people in your industry and / or network.
Step 2: You attend interviews
Step 3: You are offered a position & you accept it.
Step 4: You give notice to your current employer.
Step 5: You start your new job.
Being government funded is no guarantee to proper governance or the proper running of a sustainable enterprise. It might be worthwhile for the OP to refer this to the Charities Regulator whose role it is to ensure proper governance in registered charities. Indeed they were set up in response to some major financial mismanagement in large charities in the past.What is shocking to me is a government funded entity can jeopardise the livelihoods of so many 3rd parties just because its a total basket case for over spends. Something should be done to address the over spends, much of which is not at the coal face, rather in ineffective administration.
I don't disagree. By the way the entity I referred to was HSE. It's probably not correct to say it's Gloverment funder. Rather a Government (tax payer) funded health body, fully under the remit if the Dept of Health.Being government funded is no guarantee to proper governance or the proper running of a sustainable enterprise. It might be worthwhile for the OP to refer this to the Charities Regulator whose role it is to ensure proper governance in registered charities. Indeed they were set up in response to some major financial mismanagement in large charities in the past.
Yeah, fair enough. I just mentioned it in the context of the OP's situation in a charity that's largely funded by the HSE. In those circumstances, it's far less likely that the government would step in to cover any shortfalls.I don't disagree. By the way the entity I referred to was HSE. It's probably not correct to say it's Gloverment funder. Rather a Government (tax payer) funded health body, fully under the remit if the Dept of Health.