Duke of Marmalade
Registered User
- Messages
- 4,596
Daily Express said:Donald Trump is heading for second presidential victory, poll shows
DONALD TRUMP is on course to win the US presidential election with a three-point lead over Joe Biden, a shock poll suggests.
Well she was certainly never electable.I would disagree with that.
Well she was certainly never electable.
Her pole ratings with Democrats weren't the problem, it's whether she could win over the floating voters in the middle ground of the swing States. She is just too alien for the Christians in the land of the permanently frightened. Americans have lots of guns and lots of police to try to compensate for the fact that they have no backbone.Against Donald Trump? I think she would, her poll ratings in primaries had gone ahead of Harris who subsequently quit - now Harris makes up part of the 'ticket'?
We will never know now, all speculation, but I would imagine she would take on Trump blindfolded and with one hand tied behind her back.
I am trying to understand the betting. I have no doubt that if the election was tomorrow Trump would be at least 20/1 based on current polls.
Yes all the social media stuff is affecting the way folk make up their minds but a poll is a poll. The betting markets clearly do not think that today's polls are a reliable indication of people's views in 2 months' time, but I think they would accept that they are a fair representation of their current views.
They think it is all up for grabs. I have mentioned a few possible game changers in Trump's favour between now and polling day. There may also be the view that he is not beyond dirty tricks. Maybe take out another Iranian general or a faux trade dispute with China.
Before doing a deep dive on your analysis, was 290 central to your argument or was it just a misprint of the correct figure of 270?I disagree with some of the predictions on here and think an evens bet on Biden is pretty good odds at the moment. Recall that the overall polls in 2016 were reasonably accurate at the overall vote share. The failure was on the state by state calculations and the electoral college. But the outcome at the time was rated as a 30% chance - not out of the range of possibilities. And the estimate is about the same now - again not out of the realm of possibilities but would be unlikely.
But if we forget our biases and leanings, looking purely at the betting markets rather than polls there is an internal inconsistency. I can't square the following;
Overall winner : pretty much dead even. But popular vote winner is about 1:4 for Biden. So the betting market is predicting quite a significant likelihood of Biden winning the popular vote.
So that requires Trump to repeat 2016 and win the electoral college with a minority popular vote. Two ways he can do this;
- Repeat 2016 and win Florida, Penn, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, North Carolina
- Not win all of the above but swap out a number of smaller states for some of the bigger ones which would require winning Navada and Maine but still requires Florida, Georgia, Arizona, North Carolina.
So looking at the betting markets for the states. The states he needs to win in either route
Florida (even)
Arizona (even)
Georgia has Trump at 1.3 so pretty safe but North Carolina at 1.66 is less conclusive
For route 1 above
Pennsylvania has Democrats favourites at 1.6
Wisconsin has Dems @ 1.7
Michigan has Dems @ 1.5
For route 2 above
Maine has Dems at 1.25
Nevada looks pretty safe
So I can't reconcile markets which (a) show high probability of Biden winning popular vote, (b) shows a lot of critical states at evens which Trump would need to win ALL of irrespective of which route to 290 electoral votes and(c) shows Democrats favourites to win swing states in both routes to 290 which he would also need to win ALL of (in either route) and yet.... has Trump as evens to get to 290.
On a pure stats / probability basis - there has to be an arbitrage there. From a stats point of view, (Fl @ 0.5) x (Ar @ 0.5) etc etc can't equal 0.5 probability of overall win
Before doing a deep dive on your analysis, was 290 central to your argument or was it just a misprint of the correct figure of 270?
Of course Trump to win Florida and to win Arizona are far from independent events, if he wins Florida he most likely wins Arizona. But you know that.The latter, sorry - I meant to say 270
And one might not need to run the naked risk, the markets could correct themselves and so you can cash out at a profit.
Pretty deplorable event. Trump was his own worst enemy by persistently interrupting like a petulant child. He actually did quite well when being the salesman, selling the economy and law & order. But its hard to think he is not still somewhat an adolescent.
Biden held up better than I thought he would, a few stumbles but no obvious clangers. Best line of the night to Biden, "how can you take this clown seriously?....sorry, this President"
Trump now 2.4 to win Florida and 3.3 to win Outright. The arbitrage (buy F at 2, sell O at 2) would be well in the money.Looks like the market has corrected to some extent. Still think 5/4 for Trump is pretty short odds given the number of things he needs to go the right way
Trump now 2.4 to win Florida and 3.3 to win Outright. The arbitrage (buy F at 2, sell O at 2) would be well in the money.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?