Departing tenant seeking rent refund as last rent review done by text!

Ailinf said:
suggested a rental increase. Hence the going to Threshold.
Click to expand...
Do I have this right:

1. You increased the rent 2 years ago, not taking into account the RPZ & not using the correct procedures.

2. Then more recently you proposed another rent increase, again ignoring RPZ / procedures.

3. Tenant looks for refund of overpaid rent from two years back.
 
elcato said:
OK. I got the impression from your first post that they were leaving anyway. It seems you may have inflamed the issue by suggesting a rent increase and I presume the they're not gong anywhere now.
Click to expand...
The suggested increase got them talking to threshold, who subsequently advised them to go after the invalid notice of rent increase.
DannyBoyD said:
Have you reregistered each year since?
Click to expand...
yes.
 
1. 2.5 years ago- was not aware the area had been added to the RPZ. The only incorrect part was a text was sent instead of letter - all other parts were followed.
2. I suggested a rent increase for 6 months time - this would be 3 years since the last increase. I had a good relationship with them so would not hit them with a rent increase notice without flagging it with them first.
3. Here lies the dispute. They believe it's overpaid, I believe they had very reasonable rent for a very long time and they are using an innocent procedural mistake to get money out of me before they move on. And it's looking like they will!
 
The OP is in the wrong and there is no point pursing this by contesting it with the RTB. The mediation process is going to suggest the landlord repay all excess rent, it's all they can do. Even if they suggest a compromise, the tenants don't have to accept it, and why would they, they know the landlord didn't follow the procedures so they have him over a barrel.

As for adjudication, why would the landlord want the potential possibility of a fine. Which might, or might not be large.
 
Sorry to tell you but complaining to Threshold is laughable. What would that achieve. Their job is to help the poor badly treated tenants against the mean bad wealthy landlords.

Also I don't get the financial stress, aren't you selling, and we are talking less than 4K. Something not making sense to me as the thread developes.
 
I agree re complaining Threshold - it will be pointless for sure, but I feel strongly about it so it will rest easier with me if I make my feelings known.
And maybe €4000 is not a lot of money to some, but it is to me.

Thanks to all for all the great advice.
I have just looked into the RTB dispute process - and invalid notice of rent review is on the list of dispute types. I partly guessed they knew they were onto a winner.
Case closed I'm afraid.
Thanks again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you Annieindublin. Still have a large mortgage and just out of negative equity. I will be selling - the RPZ has made sure of that - I am loosing monthly - and there's no way practical way around increasing the rent to anywhere near market value (rent is currently below 1000 in an area that is getting 1,800 -fool me!!) Major refurb - not an option really, BER currently at C2 or leave vacant for 2 years?? Only option is to sell I think.
 
It is possible for you to contest this. The worse that can happen is you lose. Your tenants will become famous. Serve notice on them. Refuse a reference. It is a business not a charity. Advertise for a Ukrainian looking for a home under the ARP. It is €800 tax free and outside the scope of RTB. After two years rent again at market value.
 
Sarenco said:
Well, the RTB could impose a sanction of up to €15,000 for breaching the RPZ requirements.

I think that’s unlikely but it’s certainly possible.
Click to expand...
When you enter into any contentious adversarial process, it's important to establish the limits of what might happen.

That's why I suggested earlier, only slightly facetiously:
T McGibney said:
1. Get legal advice.
2. Put the property up for sale.
Click to expand...
 
T McGibney said:
That's why I suggested earlier, only slightly facetiously:
Click to expand...
Hmmm.

You previously told us that you suggested getting legal advice to argue for the application of some time limit that isn’t set out in the legislation.
T McGibney said:
There probably is, albeit unacknowledged by the RTB/legislation.

That's why I suggested you get legal advice.
Click to expand...
Anyway, I don’t see any point in getting legal advice in this case.
 
Sarenco said:
Hmmm.

You previously told us that you suggested getting legal advice to argue for the application of some time limit that isn’t set out in the legislation.

Anyway, I don’t see any point in getting legal advice in this case.
Click to expand...
Sorry, I'm not reigniting yesterday's argument all over again.
 
Silversurfer said:
Advertise for a Ukrainian looking for a home under the ARP. It is €800 tax free and outside the scope of RTB. After two years rent again at market value
Click to expand...

The ARP is due to end in March 2025. It may not but it is notable that the government have been cutting supports to Ukrainians in recent months.

Other supports are likely to be provided instead but may be back in the scope of the RTB.

Accommodation Recognition Payment Scheme: Your questions answered

www.gov.ie
 
To underline the point that you are unlikely to win RTB case in this instance. Tenant was advertising the flat on booking.com & even had the property owner replace mattresses when "guests" complained about beds.

Landlord ordered to pay back rent and deposit to tenant subletting out apartment

Residential Tenancies Board says landlord should have issued warning notice to terminate the tenancy
www.irishtimes.com

Extract:
"A landlord who changed the locks of a Dublin 4 apartment after discovering her tenant was subletting it on an accommodation booking website was ordered to return rent paid and a €2,300 deposit by a Residential Tenancies Board tribunal last month.

The landlord explained how she encountered a cleaner entering the property on South Lotts Road “carrying lots of sheets and towels” in December, who informed her that she was preparing the property for the “next guest”.

During the hearing, the tenant repeatedly denied subletting the apartment noting that the property was advertised by someone with a different name."

"The tenant was seeking damages of €5,000, arguing that he was illegally evicted, alongside the return of his deposit and 10 days rent which he had paid until the end of December.

Noting the landlord’s “comprehensive evidence”, the tribunal was satisfied that the tenant did, in fact, sublet the property.

Although the tribunal found the tenant to be in breach of his obligations, the landlord should have issued a warning notice and the termination of the tenancy was therefore invalid, it said."
 
That is crazy!! Yes, no point in taking this further. I have informed tenant I will pay him what he is looking for. Thanks for all the advice. Much appreciated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register