C
Contrarian
Guest
`Well as they say 'give people freedom and all they do is imitate each other'
walk2dewater said:..But answer me this Homeowner, cos this is the real crux of the issue: Why don't you want to see cheaper housing? Sure don't we all want things we need to be cheaper, cheaper petrol, cheaper clothes, cheaper food?
Contrarian said:`Well as they say 'give people freedom and all they do is imitate each other'
phoenix_n said:"The severity of the winner's curse gets stronger as the number of bidders increases. This is because the more bidders there are, the more likely it is that some of them have greatly overestimated the good's value. In technical terms, the winner's expected estimate is the value of the first order statistic, which increases as the number of bidders increases."
Isnt that what happened in the first quater of this year. I can attest to this having being involved in numerous bidding wars where thankfully i always lost.
walk2dewater said:[
But answer me this Homeowner, cos this is the real crux of the issue: Why don't you want to see cheaper housing? Sure don't we all want things we need to be cheaper, cheaper petrol, cheaper clothes, cheaper food?
homeowner said:And if that is the posters here, can they say that so we can put more weight on their opinion rather than people on either side of the debate who "need" the market to go one way or the other.
phoenix_n said:In reality FTB's should be alright. So what if the house has fallen value they still need a place to live and they are reducing their capital. Once they didnt get into a bidding war or choose 'best house in worst location' then all things being equal there should be no real problems. Trader uppers made use of the equity and in reality are paying somewhat simmilar mortgages if not a bit higher. This group will need to cut costs but in general they overall expenditure is decreasing anyway.
Its really 1 and 2 bed apartments bought by investors that are gonna get the hit as when you have to subside the mortgage and having to deal with an illiquid asset then many will try to cut and run. The illiquidity of the asset, i think, will be the 'newest' conversation to be had at those parties. You're stuck with something than is costing you money and no-one wants to buy it. And you hear that poland/germany etc is the place to be buying.....
I'd have to qualify that statement. I'm not entirely sure that all those FTBs were fortunate enough to be in a position to buy something which they could consider living in for years and years to come. There are a lot of FTBs in one bedroomed apartments in poorly serviced blocks who will get caught because their ability to trade up may be limited, particularly if they had a high LTV. One of my main other cribs about property in Ireland has been the lack of attention to the utility of new developments being built, and the heavy emphasis on starter homes which have no long term needs in mind.phoenix_n said:In reality FTB's should be alright. So what if the house has fallen value they still need a place to live and they are reducing their capital. Once they didnt get into a bidding war or choose 'best house in worst location' then all things being equal there should be no real problems. Trader uppers made use of the equity and in reality are paying somewhat simmilar mortgages if not a bit higher. This group will need to cut costs but in general they overall expenditure is decreasing anyway.
Its really 1 and 2 bed apartments bought by investors that are gonna get the hit as when you have to subside the mortgage and having to deal with an illiquid asset then many will try to cut and run. The illiquidity of the asset, i think, will be the 'newest' conversation to be had at those parties. You're stuck with something than is costing you money and no-one wants to buy it. And you hear that poland/germany etc is the place to be buying.....
edo said:Jeez Gravity Girl !
Dont know if I fully understand the point you are trying to make - but I think the rest of the guys have pretty much nailed it already.
there is no way on Gods Earth that property price per square foot is worth more in BallyBough than Manhattans upper east side .
Apartment versus House is irrelevant here - there only "houses" I know in Manhattan are in the Zoo in Central Park!
With all respect When someone can justify that a relatively neglected,underdeveloped (with lots of potential heh heh!) inner suburb of what is a provincial European City is worth more than a classy gentrified upper class area of one of the Worlds Greatest and wealthiest cities , without a batting an eyelid at the complete absurdity of it all - Then everything that has happened with the property market in this country becomes clear - We've completely lost the friggin plot!
Sayonara Folks - Japanese style property market here we come!
Remix said:I find it quite interesting that the estate agents are making no reference to the higher price and are avoiding the phrase "asking price reduced" which would be a normal sales term to attract in buyers.
Yah. Rent will not rise in Ireland with the vacancy levels we have (16% of properties are empty) . Landlords (save in a few hotspots) have no pricing power.....meaning that rents will not rise.!!!!!Afuera said:To get a 6% yield average, rent would have to rise to 2,400 per month or the average price of property would have to fall to 250,000 (a 48% drop).
2Pack said:Yah. Rent will not rise in Ireland with the vacancy levels we have (16% of properties are empty) . Landlords (save in a few hotspots) have no pricing power.....meaning that rents will not rise.!!!!!
As we are different and special here in Ireland will will simply adjust to our 2% yields and carry on regardless , of course we will
Don't know about that. Currently I think property rental is already supported by HSE payments, certainly in the north Dublin area. And although I know it's the subject of much debate here, I really do wonder how much new property will go to rental given that the difference between rental income and mortgage outgoing is not in favour of the investor at the moment. Put simply, I think any savvy investor will be reluctant to invest a massive amount of money at this stage. I'm not expert enough to know if landlords can write off massive losses on one property against other properties where they have an income in excess of their costs.beattie said:Hit the nail on the head, there is so much property due to come on stream inside the next 12 months that rents will come down in nominal terms which will be a huge hit as inflation shows no sign of abating
phoenix_n said:Where the vendor wants it sold he won't care what language the agent will use.