Yes - excellent summary.Can this not all be summed up in the following ways:
1. No one gets something for nothing - even a missionary nun, student, bank clerk or football fan.
2. Could her neighbour not have just paid over €2 for her?
3. It's always pretty clear you've to pay for refreshments on board unless you're informed otherwise. I was on an Aeroflot flight this year where everything except alcohol or cans of minerals were free, but I wished I'd handed back the cardboard, sorry sandwich.
Even in a 45 minute hop from London to Dublin?Personally I feel that ALL airlines should provide a minimum level of catering for free (such as water (even tap water!), tea or coffee)
Why should non imbibers subsidise imbibers? As mentioned earlier if you want full service as regards food/drink you can usually pay a premium for it.Put an extra euro on the fares, and let passengers feel that they can get a drink of something, even if they don't have any money on them.
Sounds to me like any passenger who could not pay would be treated the same way. The specifics of the individual's job/vocation are irrelevant in my opinion. I honestly can't see what the big deal is here. I don't consider it to reflect badly on the service provider in question at all.However, even in the case above, very poor discretion was shown by the hostess in not simply allowing the drink as a once-off freebie! Who's gonna lose out? Who cares about a cup of coffee for God's sake? Look how much bad publicity it's generated!!
Even in a 45 minute hop from London to Dublin?
Yes! It's not compulsory!
Why not buy shares in one or more airlines and lobby for such usage of the company's resources?
Why should non imbibers subsidise imbibers? As mentioned earlier if you want full service as regards food/drink you can usually pay a premium for it.
There's a degree of tightness being displayed here which I think is unhealthy, ...we're talking about a glass of water, or a cup of tea or coffee from a big jug! How much could that cost? A few cents perhaps, enough scope still for profit! I only suggest a minimum level of complimentary liquids; sell other drinks and food by all means.
Sounds to me like any passenger who could not pay would be treated the same way. The specifics of the individual's job/vocation are irrelevant in my opinion. I honestly can't see what the big deal is here. I don't consider it to reflect badly on the service provider in question at all.
I never mentioned any job/vocation. I agree that everyone should be treated the same (see above)
I suppose the nun could have spat in the cup to see if that would mean that she could keep it.
The last thing I'll say on this is just to summarise my comments above - the cost of supplying a free cup of tea or coffee, or a glass of water, will NOT affect the company's bottom line! Conversely, the first airline to drop this policy of seizing every opportunity to screw more money out of its passengers should be applauded, and it would be such a cheap and simple way of generating passenger goodwill towards the airline. Keep charging by all means for 'more substantial' or more expensive food and drinks, but we're only talking about a cuppa! And yes, treat everybody the same - give everyone a cup of tea if they want one, and if the non-imbibers feel hard done by, go ahead and have a cup.
Never mind extras like coffee. Was on an aer lingus flight from JFK to shannon and the guy next to me had a fairly bad nose bleed just after take off. Seemed a bit shy so I asked the cabin staff if they had a tissue/first aid kit and was informed that there was no first aid kit on the plane. Would have thought this would be mandatory.
Hostess did offer to get a roll of tape from her bag if that would be any help!
Either that or simply telling fibs?I am sure they are breaking the law if there was no first aid kit on board.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?