Do we have to fill in the ... blanks ourselves?i'm on a full license but did drive on a provisional for a number of years having failed 1 test and waiting for a resit and I believe this is a joke BUT it wont be enforced, the previous law was just the same bar the 1000 euro fine and having been stopped on a couple of occassions by d guards they never asked why i did not have a full time driver in the car with me. sorry to go a bit off topic but I think this is absolute master spin by berties well paid spin doctors, d same day bertie gets a whopping undeserved payrise d whole country is up in arms about this license...coincidence...i think not my friends...noel dempsey was found to have made a huge mistake re shannon did not resign....cowen looks like he's going to raise taxes in a tough budget... all in all a pitiful week for d government but never mind all that we are too angry over this new crackdown to pay attention to what is happening in the background...gross incompetence by d government who reward themseleves with pay raises....
Not if they are effectively making 400K people law breakers overnight it's not - where's the fairness in that? Sure us license holders can all pious and take the moral high ground but how a bit of realism for those 400K not in our fortunate position?
Truthseeker let me make this a bit more real for you - people in rural areas want to go for a pint once in a while. They want to be responsible so instead of the bad old days of bringing their car they have their partner bring them instead and then ask their partner to collect them later on. So now in this pious new world of ours how do you expect this responsible couple to manage? Maybe we just drink at home and become an even more isolated community than we are already becoming?
--"If this now means you cant get to work - tough"
- - I'd like you to say that face to face with somebody with dependants who stands to loose thier job, and cant make the mortgage payment the next time theres a hike - its very easy to judge in this faceless website - shame!
So you're saying I should feel sympathy for people who deliberately miss test appointments, are not bothered to improve their driving status and who have otherwise demonstrated that they shouldn't be on the road?
Well I don't. What they are doing is illegal, immoral, lazy and dangerous - shame on them, I would suggest.
And if I came face to face with those provisional drivers who fall into this category I would have no problem telling them so.
well I'm sure there is someone close to home that falls into thiis bracket so maybe you could start there..... rather than spouting this "McDowell type" rhetoric in an anonymous capacity...he doesnt seem to have gone away !
Don't know about others, but my point was that the tester wasn't even paying attention to what I was doing. She seemed to tick boxes at random throughout the test. I have no idea whether I did any good at all really. Doesn't really help me when it some to improving for a retest either.
IMHO these suggestions are as ridiculous as the suggestion that 400,000 drivers are taken off the roads 'overnight.'
Lol, there's irony in there.and I note that [broken link removed] is after crashing this morning...
I am puzzled at the people coming on here claiming they failed their test for a specific reason and that it wasn't fair. The testing system states that if you have a certain amount of grade 1 or grade 2 faults you fail and a grade 3 fault fails. The grade 3 faults are obviously when you are causing danger to others so why on earth should you pass your test if you are causing danger?????????
Another on a provisional says she thinks the law is completely unenforceable and intends to drive on the same.
Very naive post altogether.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?