As for the 'basic idea' that people need to consider their commute options when choosing where to live, IT'S VERY SIMPLE - people have to work in the cities to pay their massive mortgages, but can't afford to live in the cities because the property is too expensive, so it's very annoying to hear you make it sound easy to get your work and home close to one another or that it can be 'changed over time'. You don't seem to have much concept of the difficulties first time buyers are having getting anywhere to live never mind buying where they'd like to live.
Why not realistic? I realise it can't happen overnight, but please be specific about why this is not a realistic option? We can keep building the roads, and usage will expand to soak up the available capacity. It's a never ending cycle with no solution.Yes, we can all work where we live or live where we work but it’s not a realistic solution. Why should people not expect their taxes to be spent on things that make their lives better, like better roads?
Because in most families both parents work. So you are expecting people to be able to either both find jobs that suit their skills and needs in the area that they wish to live in or find a house in an area where they can both find jobs that suit their skills and needs.Why not realistic? I realise it can't happen overnight, but please be specific about why this is not a realistic option?
Why is it a never ending cycle? Other countries have a good road infrastructure and less congestion than us. The same scenario that you suggest could be applied to public transport or any other infrastructure. Do you suggest that we should stop building schools because people will keep having children to fill them?We can keep building the roads, and usage will expand to soak up the available capacity. It's a never ending cycle with no solution.
Is that actually true? I know that most developed nations have better roads and much better public transport systems than us, but I can't think of anywhere I've been where traffic congestion is much better than here (possibly OZ), and can think of many places where congestion appears much worse (I exclude the Americas here as I have never been).Other countries have a good road infrastructure and less congestion than us.
I drive in Germany quite a bit and I can get around cities much bigger than Dublin much easier. I have less experience driving in the USA but Boston and towns in Florida were much easier to get around than Dublin. There will always be some congestion but nothing as bad as here. I am not suggesting that we are the worst, far from it. Anyone who has been stuck on a ring road around London for three hours will know this.Is that actually true? I know that most developed nations have better roads and much better public transport systems than us, but I can't think of anywhere I've been where traffic congestion is much better than here (possibly OZ), and can think of many places where congestion appears much worse (I exclude the Americas here as I have never been).
I didn't claim it was a marathon.You have a choice when your commute is 8 miles, hardly a marathon is it?
Certainly no option to work closer to home, I could chose to live closer to work but l don't want to.
I'm glad we agree that you have a choice and you have chosen to live 30 miles from work and commute everyday.
You have a choice when your commute is 8 miles,
so I choose to comute and the only option is to drive.
I could chose to live closer to work but l don't want to.
People who go on about my choices are slightly irritating though not hugely so.
I also see many cases where people choose the single-occupant car commute over realistic public transport options?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?