What the hell was the "stamp duty" comment about?
Has that comment actually been clarified? I would love to know what on earth Bertie was talking about.
Has that comment actually been clarified? I would love to know what on earth Bertie was talking about.
Mr Wall and Mr Ahern have told the tribunal that on December 3rd, 1994, Mr Wall produced £30,000 sterling in cash during a meeting in Mr Ahern's constituency centre, St Luke's. Mr Ahern's then partner, Celia Larkin, was also at the meeting. Mr Ahern put the cash in a safe.
Mr Ahern told the tribunal the money was to be used on structural work on the house that was being purchased by Mr Wall, and that Ms Larkin would oversee this.
The money was deposited by her in a bank account in her name on December 5th. Some of the money was later used to settle a stamp duty bill of approximately £8,400 that arose from the purchase of the house by Mr Wall.
It would be interesting to get a comment from Celia on this or has she done a deal with Bertie.
Are people not a little tired listening to Bertie fobbing us off by saying that it's a campaign to ruin his party's chances at re-election.
Everytime something is released to the media, he says it's sabotage. Fair enough, but can we also focus on the issue itself a bit more. Why was a businessman giving 30,000 to Celia Larkin...she can't pull any strings for him. Would it be fair to presume her relationship with Bertie was a factor in this 30,000 being handed over. If Bertie was already putting money into the house, perhaps that was 30,000 less he had to put in. Is this a wild conclusion? I think not.
It's getting ridiculous at this stage...Bertie has no credibility left in my mind. If there weren't so many hidden agendas with Bertie, there would be nothing to be released to the media and nothing to hide. How many more will come out of the woodwork...
[broken link removed], in case anyone missed it.
Fair play to V.B., I say. I liked his little reminder to P.J. about the attempts to question Haughey, back in the good ol' days...
I agree that in general it’s more serious to take bribes (from anyone) but in the case sited by the OP Enda Kenny has gained a lot more by exploiting a temp teacher for 30 years than Bertie ever got from dinner buddies or plasterers. It is, in my opinion, no right to keep a job open for yourself if doing so seriously disadvantages the person who replaces you.
Spin and counter spin. The mire that is being created around this issue is a thing to behold. Yesterdays events made for fantastic viewing. Pure pantomime.
So if we are to tow the line we must subscribe to the following:
Ah leave him alone. We need to focus our minds on what is important here. Bertie (for he is our pal) is only being hounded by the media and persons with "an agenda". The plain people of Ireland don't care that our politico's are bent. What odds if a senior governmental office holder was getting cash from friends or wealthy business people. These matters are his own private affairs. He is professional enough (as are all our elected representatives) to be able to take money in their private capacity and not have it impact on their actions as an office holder.
We are small minded to be even thinking that the "no favour asked or given" line in these matters is anything but the truth.
I mean what is the world coming to when you not only have to be clean but also be seen to be clean. Ceasers wife should have moved here....
Shame on us.
Some of them in America. Is there some talk now of $45,000. I would like to have friends like that but then again maybe not.I loved Ahern's line "I earned the money ... I got some of it from friends, it was my money ..."
Ah, to have such generous friends.
Perhaps all we are to do for the next week or so is talk about nothing other than berties monies.
If he can come up with a convincing explanation for all of this, I'll vote for him on principle ...
I don't think that he is politically corrupt (beyond the usual FF moral bankruptcy) or surely there would be less comical buffoonry involved. Rather I think he has gone to extraordinary lengths to hide money from Miriam and her lawyers. I doubt he disclosed to the courts that he had ten of thousands in ready cash lying about the place. If this proves to be the case, it could land him in real trouble.
you will vote for him on principle----- so leaving aside all the money stuff you think the Gov of the past 10 years have done a great job.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?