liteweight
Registered User
- Messages
- 1,678
You're entitled to your opinion but there's no need to get personalOriginally posted by liteweight
Sherib, I think you protest too much.
Originally posted by liteweight
....was he trying to keep this amount hidden during the period he was separating from his wife?...we DO expect him to explain where, when, why and how he came by such an amount of money. We DO expect to ask and be told whether tax was due and paid.
But I did hear him say that the legal bills took all of his savings, i.e. the £50,000. It's likely the "whip-around" by his friends paid other bills and got him off the mattress on the floor of his Constituency office or helped as a down payment on the semi-d in Drumcondra in which he reportedly still lives.
It was, they, they knew, a good few of them knew that I had taken out a loan with AIB in O'Connell Street to settle my legal bills. I had taken out the loan so I actually used the loan to settle the bills.
I'd saved quite a substantial amount of money because it was from the time I was lord mayor in '86 I'd saved in the order of 50,000. The trouble was that in the separation I agreed to provide 20,000 for my children to an educational account as part of the agreement that I made. I don't like giving details of the children but for completeness, I did that. I also had to pay off other bills, so the money I'd saved was gone.
sherib said:I have no difficulty in believing the £50,000 were honest savings unless shown to be otherwise.
Where were all these generous friends when he needed a bed?
You're entitled to your opinion but there's no need to get personal
Referring to his €/£50,000 savings: who knows? - that would be between him, his wife and their legal representatives IMO; none of my business or anyone else's.
It seems that good old Irish begrudgery is alive and well.
You're absolutely right Liteweight. Why shouldn't you ask the questions. What class of a SIN is it? As I've said in a separate thread, Gawd help us but we certainly do get the Government that some of these posters deserve. It reminds me of the old days (my mother told me about them!) when men & women went to the doctor, took whatever medication or advice the doctor gave, and asked no questions. It was "rude" apparently to ask the doctor questions, or it wasn't "nice" because he was a "busy man". Now it's apparently "bedgrudging" to ask legitimate questions about the Taoiseach and his finances. Just like it's "racist" these days to simply question the authenticity of some asylum seekers, etc etc etc. (I know that's a different topic, but I'm just making a point about free speech). Some people seem to be quite scared of those of us who dare to ask questions. I wonder if there's a medical term for that phobia? [In Bertie-speak it would probably be something like b-b-b-begorrahphobia]!Was I being personal? Sorry.
If he's in charge of the finances of the country and therefore MY finances. then it definitely is my business and yours and every other citizens'. Of course I want to know where he got it from......maybe some of it is mine!! If I move more than 5K in the bank there are questions asked. When I try to buy a house I have to fill out a form for the CAB. Why should Bertie be any different?
I hope you're not implying I'm a begrudger?Thought you didn't like to get personal? I don't begrudge Bertie anything as long as he's honest. I've a right to question what went on and to call it begrudgery is just another form of 'put down' in order to keep people silent on the subject.
He should be run out of town on a rail!
As long as it's not by rail, as there'd be no room if it's like a normal commuter train!He should be run out of town on a rail!
wish I was so broke I could go to watch my favourite 'british' team play 6 times a year.
Isn't that the question that Fine Gael's Damien English asked in the Dail yesterday. he wanted to know if Bertie was broke and couldnt afford B&B in Dublin and had to sleep on a matress yet he could afford to go to Manchester 6 times in that year. I am sure he (or maybe someone else) had to pay for B&B in Manchester as well as Flights. Something doesn't add up.
I don't think Bertie answered that question in the Dail.
It's simple really, Bertie wanted to show just how honest he really was. Presumably at that stage the position of finance minister gave one some influence over central bank interest rates. Now, a normal finance minister would obviously be impacted either positively or negatively by a change in rates, Mr. Ahern wishing to show his absolute incorruptibilty decided he could not allow himself to be in a position where his decision could have an impact on his financial well being. Ah, if only there were more like him!!I am certainly not a 'holier than thou' but I'd like to know why an educated man, an experienced politician and an ex Lord Mayor of Dublin, felt the need to keep his money under a mattress...metaphorical or not!!
Suprised this aspect of bertie story hasnt been wider reported
[broken link removed]
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?