Some breaches are so fundamental they can result in the other party walking away from the contract. Such a breach is known as a repudiatory breach and would have to go to the root of the contract. So, if you signed the mortgage and AIB refused to allow drawdown of the funds, AIB couldn’t then insist on your repaying the mortgage. This would be a repudiatory breach and the customer could validly walk away from the contract.One thing I don’t understand: a breach of contract, surely when it is a major breach, said contract can become null and void?
Thank you for that, appreciate the explanation. One more question though: when I rang them back in 2018, after receiving the initial 1650, I asked them if I should seek legal advice etc but was told no, I had absolutely nothing to question, nothing to query etc. They made it sound that we lucked out to be receiving that cheque. Hence why I’m genuinely stumped.Some breaches are so fundamental they can result in the other party walking away from the contract. Such a breach is known as a repudiatory breach and would have to go to the root of the contract. So, if you signed the mortgage and AIB refused to allow drawdown of the funds, AIB couldn’t then insist on your repaying the mortgage. This would be a repudiatory breach and the customer could validly walk away from the contract.
I don’t see AIB’s breach of 3.2 as such a breach.
€615 of the €1,615 was notionally to go towards the seeking of legal advice.Thank you for that, appreciate the explanation. One more question though: when I rang them back in 2018, after receiving the initial 1650, I asked them if I should seek legal advice etc but was told no, I had absolutely nothing to question, nothing to query etc. They made it sound that we lucked out to be receiving that cheque. Hence why I’m genuinely stumped.
I know but hence my point, I was purposely told not to pursue it. I never knew about the 3:2. How would I of. My confusion is that the helpline(really?) were evidently instructed to say that there was no reason to pursue. I was pregnant, we were in arrears, we were both just getting back on our feet career wise so I felt like it was a little bonus. We are now 2 years without missing a payment, arrears capitalized. This end result is phenomenal for us. But, I can’t shrug the feeling that we should at least be put on a tracker as per contract.€615 of the €1,615 was notionally to go towards the seeking of legal advice.
Look. I entirely agree. I’m was in the same boat until I discovered I’m in the 300 group.I know but hence my point, I was purposely told not to pursue it. I never knew about the 3:2. How would I of. My confusion is that the helpline(really?) were evidently instructed to say that there was no reason to pursue. I was pregnant, we were in arrears, we were both just getting back on our feet career wise so I felt like it was a little bonus. We are now 2 years without missing a payment, arrears capitalized. This end result is phenomenal for us. But, I can’t shrug the feeling that we should at least be put on a tracker as per contract.
The 300 cohort might expect a more detailed calculation.Hi All,
General question, what do people expect these letters to say that we don't already know ?
I know there will be a nice cheque with them but what else can they say.
Karen Case
12% write down
Refund of interest. How it was calculated.
Complain to AIB if not happy.
Complain to FSOP
and then it will say AIB are wonderfull and put our customers first maybe not that bit.
Sorry Brendan. I get confused and just replied to a post. Will repost in correct threadGuys I know that this thread is to keep other threads on topic. But why you would not discuss your questions about the 300 cohort in that thread, I just don't know.
Brendan
Hi, if this is too personal you don’t have to reply. I’m just curious how much your write down was for? I’m trying to guess how much I’m due would be nice too have a ball parkI just received my check for €6880 I'm absolutely over the moon