Sums up the whole thread imo.Why not allow the option of a letter or an email?
truthseeker - the only reason I can see in your post for not ringing to clarify that you have paid would be the cost of the call and presumption that you would be put on hold and passed from person to person.
I agree it would be better if they gave an email or postal address to contact.
I would be interested to know exactly of the wording in the letter that you consider intimidating if you would be kind enough to post it? I have to say that the words quoted by Greta above ('it has come to our attention that you may be liable for the Household charge') sound very reasonable albeit that this is just a snippet and may not be in context.
It does seem to me, based on the comments in this thread, that a decision to force a trivial matter like this to court when there is a much simpler solution is driven by a desire to vex the authorities and is born of malice. If Dermot can convince the judge that his actions were driven by a sense of civic duty and were reasonable then he has nothing to fear.
My core point as to whether people consider it is reasonable to force enormous expense on the public purse over a matter could be easily resolved with a phone call (maybe even a long phone call) has gone unanswered by all posts to date.
Why would you think that they are doing nothing serious, given the earlier posts on this thread?If the government are basically doing nothing serious to collect those charges they are effectively telling me that I'm an idiot for having paid this year and a complete lunatic if I pay any more.
Frank;1274969 Maybe the person that was supposed to be cross checking was out sick.[/QUOTE said:Or maybe one of the addresses had an Irish language version and one didn't. Or maybe the owner used an Irish language name on one database, but not the other.
Or maybe there was a slight variation in the address used in one database - my gas bill ALWAYS comes to a slightly different address to all other bills.
There are a ton of possible reasons for these small variations affecting a relatively small number of people.
Frank;1274969 You pay you get letters you don't pay you get letters. [/QUOTE said:Or to be more accurate,
You pay and a small percentage of you get letters you don't pay you get letters.
I am curious to what people reckon will happen next?
There are so many posts on this and so many arguments for and against that I won't repeat them.
My query is - what will law-abiding guys, like me who have paid NPPR and property charges do next year when they get a much bigger property charges ?
It's one thing to be annoyed this year at paying when others have not.
It's far worse to continue paying even higher charges when those non-payers are getting away with it .
If the government are basically doing nothing serious to collect those charges
And now they are talking about a second letter and then legal action within months. Anyone I know that hasn't paid it haven't even received one letter. It's a complete joke.
http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/0816/household-charge-legal-action.html
Sunny,
the first letter was sent to landlords only.
With no regard for whether or not they had paid.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?