Any reason to NOT opt in to 'smart meter services' ..?

Curious.

ESB refused to release the data stored on an individual smart meter following a FoI request by the householder

Ireland’s electricity network agency has been told it risks encouraging “suspicions about surveillance” in refusing to release details of the data recorded by its smart meter network.

Privacy advocacy group Digital Rights Ireland has said a lack of transparency regarding the smart meter network will serve to increase distrust in the machines among the public after the ESB refused to release the data stored on an individual meter following a request to that effect by the Wicklow household in question.

A recent freedom of information request by a Co Wicklow resident, seeking details of all of the information uploaded by his smart meter to date, was refused by the ESB, citing the risk of breaching the “network and information systems which it uses in its operations”.

In refusing the request, the ESB said it had “identified that the release of unauthorised sensitive information... into the public domain, is a security risk”.
It said the relevant data list pertaining to the individual meter could “be used to establish the design and potential vulnerabilities of the meters, which in turn could allow bad actors to compromise individual meters and/or the entire smart metering system”.
The officer who refused the request added the release of such information could “create a cyber security risk by providing public access to sensitive security information and codes” which in turn “could facilitate the commission of a crime”.

A spokesperson for Digital Rights Ireland said: “Not being completely transparent about the operation of the meters only heightens suspicions about surveillance.
“If ESB Networks really need to collect this information, the least they can do is be transparent about what they are collecting and why. Families have a right to know what is going on."

From the Irish Examiner website.
 
Last edited:
This sounds like a strange excuse:
It said the relevant data list pertaining to the individual meter could “be used to establish the design and potential vulnerabilities of the meters, which in turn could allow bad actors to compromise individual meters and/or the entire smart metering system”.
The officer who refused the request added the release of such information could “create a cyber security risk by providing public access to sensitive security information and codes” which in turn “could facilitate the commission of a crime”.
Sounds a bit like security by obfuscation rather than by design if they are aware of potential vulnerabilities and rather than fix them they want to just hide them.
 
Agreed, a very strange response and one that has likely triggered more and not less security risk.

Under a FoI request they had no obligation whatsoever to release information sensitive to the operation of their communications. Why not just release the reading data and redact the sensitive stuff?
 
Thanks for that notification as I found it very good. A lot of their problems appear to be tied into weak signal issues and poorly installed meters in the early days.
I didn't see the program but I had read articles on the issues there. In the north, due to the dispersed nature of the population and the reliability of mobile coverage, they decided to use radio for the data connections with mobile data connections as we have here used in the south.

The mobile solution in the south works well, but in the north there's a significant number of properties where the radio signal isn't strong enough to make a reliable connection to the grid stations. Switching to mobile data would solve many of these issues but the regulator is not currently permitting the use of mobile connections there.

An interesting issue, but one that doesn't affect us.
 
Hi Leo,

They also placed a lot of blame on the changeover being optional. One guy in Glasgow has had his meter changed 6 times so the whole problem must be costing a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leo
Back
Top