Is it not the case that the developers want to build 4/5 beds where possible to maximize profit, the planners want 3/4 beds for families and the majority don't want to downsize but want to stay in the house that they have put so much into? So who wants a smaller 1/2 bed house? Only those willing to downsize and childless couples. That's not a big cohort of people.The lack of a suitable mix of housing in many areas is a huge disincentive for many older people to downsize as it often means they would have to leave the area and move away.
The planning process which encouraged or indeed only allowed a standard type of house to be built is at fault.
Many, many plans to add a mix of smaller houses and apartments into an area of standard 3- or 4- bedroom houses was met with dismay and stonewalled by the very people who now moan about the lack of suitable housing to move into.
The planners and politicians who are responsible for this state of affairs are only interested in the short term - ie can I get re-elected next year or the year after - long term housing planning is non-existent in this country
Even if there is a mix it can get tricky,The lack of a suitable mix of housing in many areas is a huge disincentive for many older people to downsize as it often means they would have to leave the area and move away.
The planning process which encouraged or indeed only allowed a standard type of house to be built is at fault.
Many, many plans to add a mix of smaller houses and apartments into an area of standard 3- or 4- bedroom houses was met with dismay and stonewalled by the very people who now moan about the lack of suitable housing to move into.
The planners and politicians who are responsible for this state of affairs are only interested in the short term - ie can I get re-elected next year or the year after - long term housing planning is non-existent in this country
Can you expand on this. I am not sure what you mean.
If the older owner has died, let's say the proceeds go to the children........how will this action increase supply?
I am retired I own 3 houses the one I live in at present is close to a large town worth quite a lot of money I would like to downsize and move further into town, I also own a house out the country a bit from where I live at present I rent it out there is also a workshop where I enjoy spending time,Apologies if point wasn't clear. The current inheritance tax threshold is 335k. The point I was making is that if the government incentivised the sales of properties for a short period of time by exempting the proceeds of the sale of properties from inheritance tax thresholds it may bring more family type homes on to market to address supply issues. This point is made in conjunction with exemptions for annexes or granny flats to be allowed also. It could in some instances encourage some older people to sell up move into a granny flat on a child's property and freeing up a house for young family.
How about 66% benefit in kind tax on the employer contributions section of all pensions including lump sum at drawdown and reinvest it in building extra homes, the real problem is a shortage of new builds
I am retired I own 3 houses
.
But you would not be thrown out. A rise in LPT all around (not just on the Leper household or on the over 60s, etc) would in my opinion, encourage a better use of the housing stock. If you are paying €600 and it rose to €6000 then you and Mrs. Leper are well capable of making a rational choice on whether to stay or move to somewhere with a lower rating (or attaching the charge to the house if you are unable to pay). Out of say every 1000 Leper households if 500 decided to move this would result in a greatly increase supply of family homes in a location desired by, and suitable for, the active workforce (and assuming this applies to your location).
But as mentioned by another poster, it is very unlikely to happen. Everyone likes to to moan about services, planning, housing, traffic, etc etc. but few see themselves being involved in the problem never mind the solution. And damn any politician who suggests otherwise.
How about 66% benefit in kind tax on the employer contributions section of all pensions including lump sum at drawdown and reinvest it in building extra homes, the real problem is a shortage of new builds
we could try out the benefit in kind on the pensions of those who suggested increasingLPT,
I doubt that there is a very high proportion people living in €600,000+ homes and dependent on the State pension for a living. But no doubt there are some. But we all make decisions based on the prevailing economic incentives and disincentives to some extent. And such a person would not be "forced out" of his or her home. The charge could be deferred and discharged out of the estate. Or the person may choose to move. It would be good if singles/couples decided to move on from homes which are far too big for their current needs (and too demanding/costly to maintain) and allowed the housing stock to be recycled to working families. A bigger ongoing turnover of housing stock, combined with a substantial property tax, should help with regards to house price inflation also.I finished on a very good pension thanks to my employer contributions other retirees who may have a good Employers funded pension would not miss 6000 going in LPT tax and like myself could pick and choose where to move to if they have not already moved because it suits them,
I don't believe any poster on here would like to see A large rise in the LPT on people who always paid their way to finish their final years being squeezed out of their own homes,
I am not P what is his name from MayoI doubt that there is a very high proportion people living in €600,000+ homes and dependent on the State pension for a living. But no doubt there are some. But we all make decisions based on the prevailing economic incentives and disincentives to some extent. And such a person would not be "forced out" of his or her home. The charge could be deferred and discharged out of the estate.
It might be tough with 3 houses though.
I feel sorry for the people who suggested raising the LPT to 1% to solve the housing crises if people can raise a mortgage to buy a 2M home I don't think they need Government Help,We are far too fond of feeling sorry for pensioners who are have very high property assets,
That's not correct sir\madam.But Truffado and early riser in the posting is making the case that we should increase LPT on empty nesters to force them to move,
I know The suggestion is crazy and was replying to the following post NO83 by Truffado post no 85 by leper
post no 119 by Early riser and post no 122 again by early riser,
I am enjoying a lovely day today out in the garden I get the feeling you are also enjoying your day,
I will check back tonight,
Nope.But Truffado and early riser in the posting is making the case that we should increase LPT on empty nesters to force them to move,
There’s a good chance that the person didn’t pay €2m for the home.I feel sorry for the people who suggested raising the LPT to 1% to solve the housing crises if people can raise a mortgage to buy a 2M home I don't think they need Government Help,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?