Z
I write software. This takes my time and presence. It takes years of training and keeping up with technology as well.
Why do you think I should do this for you, for free?
Anyone that is using the product for free certainly is costing me money. If everyone decides to steal the software, then I'll have to get a job doing something else.
I just don't understand why people can't see that this is nothing short of theft.
Do you steal books and sneak into cinemas without paying as well?
I just don't understand why people can't see that this is nothing short of theft.
No, I'm not perfect, ethically or otherwise.Do you ever pay cash for jobs? or get paid cash for jobs. Even if you are morally perfect there are many others who take certain views to suit their needs at the time. It's not fair but it is how things happen.
No, I'm not perfect, ethically or otherwise.
However, I don't knowingly steal stuff. I don't ever get paid cash for jobs, and pay all the taxes that the government want.
I do pay cash to other people for jobs if that is their payment terms. It is then up to that person to pay their taxes.
The problem with theft is, where do you draw the line? Is it okay to steal from Microsoft, but not the local butcher, or your next door neighbour?
Like I said, other people's tax affairs are their business.Like I said, we see things as how we want to suit ourselves. When someone is paid cash it is generally a payment that involves no tax and is subsequently cheaper to the consumer.
Like I said, other people's tax affairs are their business.
Some people prefer cash as cheques can bounce.
I just don't understand why people can't see that this is nothing short of theft.
This crowd would disagree:I love technicalities and I'm as against the morality of this as those involved (I have several friends connected with the music industry who have been heavily affected by downloading), but it isn't theft. It's copyright infringement. It isn't comparable to stealing a car or a loaf of bread in the same way that you can’t compare slander to criminal assault.
This crowd would disagree:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federation_Against_Software_Theft
As a software developer the terms, 'copyright infringement' and 'theft' have the same consequences for me. I prefer to use the term 'theft'.
It's also interesting to see where the 'copyright infringers', or 'thieves' try to justify their position on this thread. The situation is clear, copyright infrigement (or theft) is illegal. What I do, or what other people do is irrelevent. It's still illegal. There are consequences and victims. People will lose jobs etc.
I've made my point, and don't have anything else to add to this off-topic discussion.
So downloading an illegal copy of a movie is NOT theft, but shoplifting a copy of the DVD from HMV is theft - is that what you're saying?People are losing jobs, so there is no "will" there and all you say is correct, but it still isn't theft. That crowd and any other interest group can say what they will, copyright infringment is a civil issue not a criminal. The only time it becomes criminal is when someone tries to sell the copies.
This is not a "personals"/dating service, Latrade. Please read the Posting Guidelines.I know it’s sad, indicative of deeper fixations during my formative years and an explanation for the retardation of certain key social skills, yet if I don’t get to inflict genocide on a digital alien race at least once a year, I feel something is lacking in my life.
So downloading an illegal copy of a movie is NOT theft, but shoplifting a copy of the DVD from HMV is theft - is that what you're saying?
There is no moral or ethical difference between these two scenarios.
I would suggest that it is thanks to 'illegal' downloaders that CDs and DVDs have come down in price over the last couple of years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?