Matthew Moore
Registered User
- Messages
- 286
I guess it is, same name and townland. In the article it's mentioned that someone else, whose property sale to Codd fell though took the bankruptcy application which was agreed in March last year, and this court case is not a bankruptcy application, but instead is a hearing about what assets Codd has. Not sure how that works though. Also I wonder about the fact it mentions the newspaper requirement being crossed out, but surely that would have to have been completed in March last year, not now.
I suppose it could possibly be a local relative with the same name, unlikely but not impossible. At least we can now get some clarity on how many cases are moving through the system.
I intend moving my own case on now, I've had some other issues to deal with lately but this is now my priority.