Na, we need a smoke and a coffee. You're like a sentinel, a one-man Battle Group, on this thread .Do we need to rehash the No campaigns oh so virtuous and accurate interpretation of the Treaty? Do we need to rehash just who some of these have sold their souls for votes to?
If he says he has none then it's only not a straight answer if you don't believe him. Do Yes people really, honestly, believe that he is a CIA puppet?But will Ganley be cross examined on his alleged ulterior motives for advocating a No vote? Probably, but he won't give a straight answer.
May or may not? Do you think they are or not?The 'Yes' campaign may or may not be over exagerating the benefits of voting yes and the consequences of saying no but I for one see more positives than negatives.
As I said before, I never made such a claim. I said that the ECJ has undermined wages by allowing foreign companies to import workers and pay them wages that undercut agreed local minimum wages. That is a fact.You still haven't answered me where the ECJ has ruled that it is ok for the National Minimum Wage to be lowered. It's the problem with the 'No' campaign. It's all sweeping statements about minimum wages and abortion with no facts to back it up.
Neither is Ganley, at best he's a wannabe politician, let's see what happens.Michael O Leary will wipe the floor with Declan Ganley because he is not politician.