Problem with Solicitor

D

duchalla

Registered User
Messages
65
Hi,

My son bought a house and a small piece of land 10 years ago off a family friend. We had the 1 solicitor to look after the sale. As a gesture of good will, the friend agreed to pay all the legal fees. During the 10 years both my son and I have have called to the solicitor on quite a few occasions to get the deeds off the solicitor. She always had some excuse, they were with the land registery and she would contact us as soon as they came back.
Last year, my son sold the house to my daughter, so obiviously he needed the deeds to proceed with the sale, called to the solr again to get the deeds, anyway to cut a long story short, the documentation had been sitting at the bottom of her inbox for the last 10 years, she then started to do the work that she should have done 10 years ago, started sending my son bills for this and that, when i confronted her told her that all the legal fees had been paid by the family friend, she backed off, saying thats grand, he doesn't owe any money.
When we finally got the deeds off her, we brought them to my daughters solicitor, he said that they were in a total mess, the house had been transfered but the land was still in the family friends name. So the whole thing had to be re done. My son has just gotten a bill for €3,000 from my daughters solr. for work that the original solr should have done and |presume got paid for. Obiviously, my daughters solr has to get paid, what im wondering is why should my son pay for for the incompitence of the original slor? Legally, has he any come back? The family friend is now elderly and i dont want to be bothering him with this. Any advice, would be greatly appreciated.
 
1. Two parties engaged in such a transaction should never, ever, use the same solicitor . It is a false economy.
2. Pay the bill. Move on with the case. Then contact the first solicitor and ask that she reimburse the fees and outlays now incurred. Whether yes/no, consider reporting her to the Law Society.
3. Talk to the old family friend and see if they did indeed pay the first solicitor any money.

mf
 
tanx for that mf, thats what I was thinking of doin. probably have to get on to the family friend to find out his story. When I tried to make an appointment to see the original slor., I was told she wouldn't see me and any future correspondence will have to be done through my solicitor! what action can the law society take? Im not goin to let this go, My family and I had made numerous efforts to get the deeds of the property, only to be lied to my face time and time again by this joke.
 
duchalla said:
tanx for that mf, thats what I was thinking of doin. probably have to get on to the family friend to find out his story. When I tried to make an appointment to see the original slor., I was told she wouldn't see me and any future correspondence will have to be done through my solicitor! what action can the law society take? Im not goin to let this go, My family and I had made numerous efforts to get the deeds of the property, only to be lied to my face time and time again by this joke.
Click to expand...

Send a registered letter to the original solicitor stating that you needed to meet with her discuss the original case. Mention in it that failure on her part to meet with you will unfortunately result in you having to take the matter further, i.e. to the law society.

If she still refuses to speak to you then go to the law society. There is a [broken link removed]on their website which explains how to approach them with complaints. It does mention that "The Society can’t deal with complaints about services provided more than five years ago."...however as you have been trying to get this information from her on more than one occassion since she originally took the case, you should still be able to make the complaint.

Good luck!!
 
At this stage, she does not have to see you. In fact, reviewing this, you were never her client so she never had to have any dealings with you at all. However, it might ease tensions if she did see your son and gave him some explanations.

So, its up to your son ( not you). What does your son want to do? If a complaint is made, by your son and /or the family friend, to the Law Society and upheld, they will censure her and it is likely that they will order her to pay your son's increased costs. She is also likely to be fined and details of the isssues published in the Law Society Gazette. This will mean acute embarassment and seriously bad publicity for her.

This won't be a popular statement but this does not appear to me to be a life or death situation. Your son ( not you) has incurred minor fees and some inconvenience but largely has suffered no lasting damage. Some people enjoy the whole "in your face" " point of principle" "I won't be treated like that" confrontational, aggravational thing. Some people simply feel that this level of service is entirely unacceptable - notwithstanding that they did not pay anything for it. At all. - and that such slipshod behaviour should be pulled up by the appropriate authorities so that other clients (paying or non paying) should not have to suffer similar behaviour. And some people say, d'ya know what? let it go. Recover the fees paid and walk away.

To each their own.

mf
 
mf1 said:
This won't be a popular statement but this does not appear to me to be a life or death situation. Your son ( not you) has incurred minor fees and some inconvenience but largely has suffered no lasting damage.
Click to expand...

I think €3000 qualifies as more than "minor fees", and 10 years of hassle followed by an administrative mess when it came to the latest transaction requiring a clean-up job by another solicitor, qualifies as more than "some inconvenience". To an ordinary punter with no legal background, I can imagine that that could be a very distressing experience.

It also doesn't matter whether the OP's son was the one paying for the service or not. Provided the fees were in fact duly handed over to the incompetent solicitor by the elderly relative 10 years ago, then the work should have been completed in a professional manner.

I also am not sure many people would "enjoy" such a potentially stressful confrontation with a legal professional. The OP's son is right to complain if s/he feels wronged and it is perfectly reasonable for him to seek to be comensated for losses.

To the OP - Get your son to send the original solicitor a registered letter, stating a reasonable deadline to reimburse the €3000. You should also explain the situation to the elderly relative and ask him if he is willing to sign the letter also. You might not want to involve him, but he was the paying client after all.

If your son gets no reply or no €3000 by the deadline, then he should complain to the Law Society and let them deal with it. But he should have very little to worry about. On the basis of the information you have provided, the solicitor is clearly at fault and incompetent.
 
What damage ( apart from the extra fees ) has the son suffered?

How much compensation should he get? Will that make him feel better?

I see no evidence of 10 years of hassle.

mf
 
mf1 said:
What damage ( apart from the extra fees ) has the son suffered?

How much compensation should he get? Will that make him feel better?

I see no evidence of 10 years of hassle.

mf
Click to expand...
I cannot believe you would write this. You do not think that a solicitor who has lied on numerous occasions, had not done the work in 10 years, then did the work but incompetently, taken the fee at the beginning but anyway sent bills not owing (after 10 years) is just basically a slight inconvenience? Do you think extra fees of 3K are nothing? Furthermore it could have resulted in a lost sale. Are you not outraged that a member of your profession acts in this manner.
 
To be fair to MF1, previous post makes it quite clear what remedies are open to OP's son.

I find this whole saga a little odd.

Firstly, why on earth would a purchaser expect the vendor to pay the purchaser's fees? And get vendor's solicitor to do the work?

Secondly, - though it is certainly possible that the solicitor did not go through it in proper detail with OP's son- how on earth did neither vendor nor purchaser notice that the contract and transfer as originally prepared did not include all that was intended to be transferred? Who prepared the transfer map? Did neither vendor nor purchaser look at it?


Thirdly why on earth would a transfer (by way of rectification) of a field incur €3000 in legal fees ( which is circa €2500 plus VAT). I regularly do (voluntary) transfers of sites for 500\600 + VAT, and I am not a cheap solicitor. How much more did the daughter have to pay on top of this €3,000?

As is, I suppose, inevitable we are only getting one side of the story, and I rather suspect that the whole story - if we had it - is rather more mundane than it appears.
 
mf1 said:
What damage ( apart from the extra fees ) has the son suffered?

How much compensation should he get? Will that make him feel better?

I see no evidence of 10 years of hassle.

mf
Click to expand...


The whole incident has placed an unbelieveable amouny of stress on our family, you might find €3000 a small amount of money, but believe me I could do alot with 3 grand.
As for compensation, gimme the €3000, yes, that will make me feel better.
whats your definiaton of hassle? 10 years later and the job still wasn't done, 10YEARS!!! doesn't that seem the slightest bit strange to you?
 
MOB said:
To be fair to MF1, previous post makes it quite clear what remedies are open to OP's son.

I find this whole saga a little odd.

Firstly, why on earth would a purchaser expect the vendor to pay the purchaser's fees? And get vendor's solicitor to do the work?

Secondly, - though it is certainly possible that the solicitor did not go through it in proper detail with OP's son- how on earth did neither vendor nor purchaser notice that the contract and transfer as originally prepared did not include all that was intended to be transferred? Who prepared the transfer map? Did neither vendor nor purchaser look at it?


Thirdly why on earth would a transfer (by way of rectification) of a field incur €3000 in legal fees ( which is circa €2500 plus VAT). I regularly do (voluntary) transfers of sites for 500\600 + VAT, and I am not a cheap solicitor. How much more did the daughter have to pay on top of this €3,000?

As is, I suppose, inevitable we are only getting one side of the story, and I rather suspect that the whole story - if we had it - is rather more mundane than it appears.
Click to expand...


Firstly, We didn't expect the vendor to pay our fees, he insisted on paying them. He is a close family friend and there is a history between our 2 families which has gone back 2 generations. Maybe we were a bit naive in getting the 1 solicitor to do the work, but at the time, it seemed like the right thing to do, hindsight is always 20/20.

Secondly, how could we check to see what was in the contracts when the she has had them for the 10 years? despite numerous efforts on our part to get the whole thing finalised. According to her, the contracts were always somewhere else getting stamped or whatever, we were told to call back in a few weeks, but it was the same old story every time,

Thirdly, the transfer was quite complicated. It involved water, right of way issues,etc. There was 2 seperate transfers to be done, house and land. I dont want to go into it in too much detail. My daughters solicitor said the whole thing was left in a complete mess. The bill was for the transfer of house and land from family friend to my son and from my son to my daughter, so the €3000 will be minus costs between my son and daughter.
 
MOB said:
To be fair to MF1, previous post makes it quite clear what remedies are open to OP's son.

I find this whole saga a little odd.

Firstly, why on earth would a purchaser expect the vendor to pay the purchaser's fees? And get vendor's solicitor to do the work?

Secondly, - though it is certainly possible that the solicitor did not go through it in proper detail with OP's son- how on earth did neither vendor nor purchaser notice that the contract and transfer as originally prepared did not include all that was intended to be transferred? Who prepared the transfer map? Did neither vendor nor purchaser look at it?


Thirdly why on earth would a transfer (by way of rectification) of a field incur €3000 in legal fees ( which is circa €2500 plus VAT). I regularly do (voluntary) transfers of sites for 500\600 + VAT, and I am not a cheap solicitor. How much more did the daughter have to pay on top of this €3,000?

As is, I suppose, inevitable we are only getting one side of the story, and I rather suspect that the whole story - if we had it - is rather more mundane than it appears.
Click to expand...


Firstly, We didn't expect the vendor to pay our fees, he insisted on paying them. He is a close family friend and there is a history between our 2 families which has gone back 2 generations. Maybe we were a bit naive in getting the 1 solicitor to do the work, but at the time, it seemed like the right thing to do, hindsight is always 20/20.

Secondly, how could we check to see what was in the contracts when the she has had them for the 10 years? despite numerous efforts on our part to get the whole thing finalised. According to her, the contracts were always somewhere else getting stamped or whatever, we were told to call back in a few weeks, but it was the same old story every time,

Thirdly, the transfer was quite complicated. It involved water, right of way issues,etc. There was 2 seperate transfers to be done, house and land. I dont want to go into it in too much detail. My daughters solicitor said the whole thing was left in a complete mess. The bill was for the transfer of house and land from family friend to my son and from my son to my daughter, so the €3000 will be minus costs between my son and daughter.
 
"so the €3000 will be minus costs between my son and daughter"

Sorry to hone in on this one small aspect; but just to be clear: the previous solicitor therefore didn't in fact cost your family €3,000. The €3,000 now includes your sons's costs on the sale to your daughter and your daughters costs on the purchase ( and perhaps a mortgage??).

And if I might hone in on another aspect - it now seems that the transfer was quite complicated. There is clearly more to this than was obvious in first post - slack ( VERY slack, it must be said) service notwithstanding.

And as to

"how could we check to see what was in the contracts when the she has had them for the 10 years? "

it doesn't really answer the question as to why nobody looked at or appeared to have comprehended what was being signed before it disappeared into the solicitors inbox for the ten years; ( I am aware of course that some solicitors can sometimes tend to say 'sign here, here and here......' rather than going through the documents fully with the client; but it seems very odd that it should have happened in this case)
 
Bronte said:
I cannot believe you would write this. You do not think that a solicitor who has lied on numerous occasions, had not done the work in 10 years, then did the work but incompetently, taken the fee at the beginning but anyway sent bills not owing (after 10 years) is just basically a slight inconvenience? Do you think extra fees of 3K are nothing? Furthermore it could have resulted in a lost sale. Are you not outraged that a member of your profession acts in this manner.
Click to expand...

If you check my earlier posts you will see the advice given. I did not use the expression "slight inconvenience" - I said it was not a life or death situation.

Could have / might have's are not things you can claim compensation for.

I try to avoid being outraged, about anything, on internet websites. I think its a pointless exercise.

mf
 
MOB said:
Firstly, why on earth would a purchaser expect the vendor to pay the purchaser's fees? And get vendor's solicitor to do the work?

Secondly, - though it is certainly possible that the solicitor did not go through it in proper detail with OP's son- how on earth did neither vendor nor purchaser notice that the contract and transfer as originally prepared did not include all that was intended to be transferred? Who prepared the transfer map? Did neither vendor nor purchaser look at it?
Click to expand...

It would be quite common in the past where there was a close relationship/friendship between parties for them to use one solicitor. It may not happen nowadays but is used to happen so I don't see how you think it's unusual.

As for suggesting that the clients read the contracts, most people think and believe that the solicitor will do everything properly in the first place. After all that's why he would have been hired in the first place. While I realise it's best if a client reads a contract, they are not legally trained and what percentage of your clients read the contract from cover to cover? Even if someone were to read part of the contract they would probably only read the signing page and not the bit which is describing what is being transferred not amind the special conditions nor clauses knowed out (in the interest of builders in particular). I'm not trying to be on the OP's side but a bit of balance to point out both sides. I'm afraid 'VERY slack' doesn't cut it unless the OP comes back with something more substantial.
 
Hi Bronte,

You are making a valid point, but I was addressing a slightly different issue.

I would not expect a client to read and understand all the conditions of a contract. That is my job. They want to know that it is basically alright and that I am protecting their interests, and in this regard they don't want to 'sweat the details'.

However, I don't know exactly what the client has agreed to buy. The client does. So it is absolutely the case that I would, for example, show a client the map on the contract or transfer deed and ask them "is this what you are buying?"

If there was any doubt, I would suggest getting an architect\engineer\surveyor to take a look.

It seems very odd indeed ( not impossible, but very, very odd) that a transfer could have been signed without either the vendor or purchaser knowing precisely what plot of ground was actually changing hands or without being shown and having a chance to query or correct it.
 
duchalla said:
My daughters solicitor said the whole thing was left in a complete mess. The bill was for the transfer of house and land from family friend to my son and from my son to my daughter, so the €3000 will be minus costs between my son and daughter.
Click to expand...

Hmm a solicitor tells you it is "a complete mess" and then gives you a large legal bill. Without reading the particular file it is impossible to say who is telling you the truth but it is not unheard of for some solicitors (or trades people for that matter) to go on about how bad the person before his/her was and then bump up their own bill accordingly for fixing the mess. Just playing devil's advocate here!
 
mf1 said:
If you check my earlier posts you will see the advice given. I did not use the expression "slight inconvenience" - I said it was not a life or death situation.

Could have / might have's are not things you can claim compensation for.

I try to avoid being outraged, about anything, on internet websites. I think its a pointless exercise.

mf
Click to expand...
HI MF1 you posted while I was doing my other post. My point is not about compensation, a client whether a paying client or not (I don't see your point about this) has a right to proper service, 10 years is really quite extraordinary. Do you not agree? And I believe solicitors should be outraged at what some of their colleagues get up to. Not for one minute do I believe that you don't get title documents in that are a complete mess due to the incompetence of previous solicitors transactions. But as you are all 'colleagues' you have the tendancy to not highlight this, it's a very nice club that leads to the likes of ML, Byrne et al. Until your profession starts to whistle blow on each other and that includes here on AAM things will not change. Same applies to bankers etc. There is a long way between life or death situation and slight inconvenience. It's also not fair that I'm the only one to point this out and I always seem to be having these battles. Would you believe that when I saw your first post I was quite happy because I thought there was a sea change in that you referred immediately to the route of going down the Law society complaints procedure so I thought that's fine so it wasn't until I saw your second post that I decided to reply to the OP. I suppose the mods are going to delete this but I'd like to see a change for the better in Irish society so that the carry on of this behaviour by professionals is a thing of the past.
 
MOB said:
Hi Bronte,

You are making a valid point, but I was addressing a slightly different issue.

I would not expect a client to read and understand all the conditions of a contract. That is my job. They want to know that it is basically alright and that I am protecting their interests, and in this regard they don't want to 'sweat the details'.

However, I don't know exactly what the client has agreed to buy. The client does. So it is absolutely the case that I would, for example, show a client the map on the contract or transfer deed and ask them "is this what you are buying?"

If there was any doubt, I would suggest getting an architect\engineer\surveyor to take a look.

It seems very odd indeed ( not impossible, but very, very odd) that a transfer could have been signed without either the vendor or purchaser knowing precisely what plot of ground was actually changing hands or without being shown and having a chance to query or correct it.
Click to expand...


You're missing the point. My son knew exactly what he was buying, the vendor knew exactly what he was selling, we had an engineer draw up the plans. This wasn't the problem. The problem was why did the solicitor take 10 years to start work on the job? why were we lied to on numerous occasions? where were the deeds during all this time? Why did the solicitor send bills to my son and when confronted immediately backed off? I could go on and on. Im an ordinary joe with no legal training but even I know somthing smells rotten here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top