It is very hard to get any clean data on this Pandemic, specifically in relation to death rates by age and pre-existing condition.
It is also troubling when This sort of thing is said;
The impression is still being given that this disease is dangerous to the fit and the young. It isn't. While we indulge in a "feeling" driven reaction to this disease we will continue to waste resources by misdirecting them. The longer we protect people who don't need to be protected the less we'll have left to protect those who do need to be protected. The only thing that will allow us to direct our resources efficiently is good data and I'm not seeing it.
It is also troubling when This sort of thing is said;
As the case definition is broadened and referrals are increased it is inevitable that the positivity rate will decrease so what Dr Cillian De Gascun should have said is “Because of the broadening of the case definition and increases in referrals the positivity rate has continued to decline. This indicates an increasingly accurate picture of COVID-19 in the community"As of midnight Monday 18 May, 295,626 tests have been carried out.
Over the past week, 36,818 tests were carried out and of these 932 were positive, giving a positivity rate of 2.5%.
Dr Cillian De Gascun, Chair of the NPHET Expert Advisory Group, said: “Despite broadening the case definition and increases in referrals the positivity rate has continued to decline. This indicates a consistent suppression of COVID-19 in the community.”
The impression is still being given that this disease is dangerous to the fit and the young. It isn't. While we indulge in a "feeling" driven reaction to this disease we will continue to waste resources by misdirecting them. The longer we protect people who don't need to be protected the less we'll have left to protect those who do need to be protected. The only thing that will allow us to direct our resources efficiently is good data and I'm not seeing it.