Misuse of data during Covid19 Pandemic

The ICU cases skew differently:
5% for under 35s
8% for 35-44
20% for 45-54
29% for 55-64
25% for 65-74
10% for 75-84
2% for 85+

So, that translates to 34 cases for 35-44 & 119 for 55-64, for example.
It means the majority of ICU admissions - but not hospitalisations - were actually for under 65s.

See Table 4:
[broken link removed]
 
odyssey06 said:
The ICU cases skew differently:
5% for under 35s
8% for 35-44
20% for 45-54
29% for 55-64
25% for 65-74
10% for 75-84
2% for 85+

So, that translates to 34 cases for 35-44 & 119 for 55-64, for example.
It means the majority of ICU admissions - but not hospitalisations - were actually for under 65s.

See Table 4:
[broken link removed]
Click to expand...
It also tells us that 90.5% of those who died had underlying conditions. If that holds true for every age group then about 10 people of working age with no underlying condition, and about 2 under the age of 45, have died from Covid 19.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top