D
darag
Guest
Re: Happy Clappy Airlines
hi tharg. i wasn't at the askaboutmoney christmas drinks thing - i was away from home that day and didn't get back 'til v. late. i think this discussion has become side-tracked and we'll have to agree to disagree. i (and others globally in the business press) think that by any standards (i.e. in comparison with other airlines), walsh has been remarkably successful. i also stick to my belief that being popular with the staff or being personable isn't all that relevant when judging his tenure. it's a side issue to be honest; it would be like hearing that he was an avid golfer or some-such piece of human interest trivia.
anyway, i've come to realise that this thread is somewhat futile as i don't think you and i would ever come to any sort of agreement no matter what arguments are presented. i think we have basic fundamental difference in world views when it comes to aer lingus. your claim that the cost of the severance packages came out of your pocket indicates to me that you believe that the staff own aer lingus. in contrast, i believe the public owns aer lingus. this basic difference means we will never view things the same way. i believe that aer lingus should be run for the benefit of the owners (i.e. the irish public) while you fundamentally seem to believe it should be run for the benefit of the staff. as a result, you didn't like walsh because he was unpleasant to the staff while i admired him because he turn losses into profits.
hi tharg. i wasn't at the askaboutmoney christmas drinks thing - i was away from home that day and didn't get back 'til v. late. i think this discussion has become side-tracked and we'll have to agree to disagree. i (and others globally in the business press) think that by any standards (i.e. in comparison with other airlines), walsh has been remarkably successful. i also stick to my belief that being popular with the staff or being personable isn't all that relevant when judging his tenure. it's a side issue to be honest; it would be like hearing that he was an avid golfer or some-such piece of human interest trivia.
anyway, i've come to realise that this thread is somewhat futile as i don't think you and i would ever come to any sort of agreement no matter what arguments are presented. i think we have basic fundamental difference in world views when it comes to aer lingus. your claim that the cost of the severance packages came out of your pocket indicates to me that you believe that the staff own aer lingus. in contrast, i believe the public owns aer lingus. this basic difference means we will never view things the same way. i believe that aer lingus should be run for the benefit of the owners (i.e. the irish public) while you fundamentally seem to believe it should be run for the benefit of the staff. as a result, you didn't like walsh because he was unpleasant to the staff while i admired him because he turn losses into profits.