"Some people are just jerks Mr Simpson"I agree with you Steven, except for the point about kids not wanting to see their parentts going without.
I am constantly amazed by the number of people who see the Bank of Mam and Dad as their automatic right.
I'm on board with this part of your argument. Children will benefit more from early investment in education than from inheritance later in life. If they are short-changed on financial literacy, the promise of a lump sum later on may even be detrimental.Most people want to have a comfortable retirement while maintaining their wealth and leaving the family home to their children.
That should not be their financial objective. Or put it another way, they should not be making serious financial sacrifices during their working life and retirement to achieve that objective.
It seems to me that (past a certain point) consumption provides sharply diminishing returns in terms of happiness. As people get older (and presumably wiser) the importance of "stuff" to their sense of wellbeing tends to decline, in favor of relationships, health and security.advisers should ... make sure that most of their clients die close to broke
I agree but the great unknown is when is the person going to die!!!
Bob retires at 60 and has a pension pot of €1m growing at 5%.
He has three choices
1.draw out €50k per year indefinitely. Pot still €1m.
2. Draw out €80k per year for 20 years. Pot nothing at age 80.
3. Draw out €58k per year for 40 years. Pot nothing at age 100.
Think I'll be burning through €80k a year and have nothing left!!
I can see no reason why 100% inheritance tax should apply...!!!
Note : Family Business / Farms etc could be transferred title to kids but if they ever sell or realize a gain from the sales of those assets then inheritance tax should kick in.
The whole point here is that individuals should " Die Broke " thus the government would end up with nothing as no tax would accrue.
People should plan to run down their savings and assets over their own lifetime.
Your average person would sell their family home upon retirement and use the funds to sub their pension , either buy a smaller place or rent. This would also have the advantage of freeing up a family home for the next generation of families and reduce the number of empty nesters in the system.
I don't agree with the prevailing sentiment. In aggregate, the current "older generation" are probably the first who will do better than their offspring. In my experience, they want their capital to endure so their kids have a backstop. Personally, I view my own pension fund as something for my kids rather than a simple retirement planning tool.
I'm not anonymous... you just don't know me!That is a brilliant analogy. I will use that. Is it plagiarism if it's first said by an anonymous person?
Brendan
Hi PaddyW ... that's a fair enough point , however my point is that the government is responsible for ensuring a fair and just society and in that context they have through Inheritance tax the capacity to make each generation start on a level playing field.
Example : If PaddyW leaves his son a house worth say 250k that's a huge advantage for his son over and above Codogly son who got nothing ...and PaddyW's son have achieved this advantage through no effort by himself.
So in the same way that the government tells PaddyW that he cant spend his hard earned money on illegal activities (Drugs / Prostitution / weapons etc ) they government could and in me opinion control inheritances to ensure a fairer society.
If you don't mind, this might be a good point to discuss... rationally looking at it then, do you think you've mixed in a legacy for the kids with your retirement fund? A retirement fund is for your retirement. You're also saving into your pension plan something to pass on to the next generation but this isn't anything to do with your retirement. But these are two distinct arrangements that we never plan for as two separate items.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?