If the markets are efficient why don't we just buy trackers which charge 0.1% to 0.25% and not bother with a financial advisor at all?
I can invest in the UK, Europe, US, Asia Pacific, Japan and track the market for less than 0.25%. Rebalance every couple of years.
Where does the advisor add value to justify an addition to these low charges?
Assuming that you are disciplined and have a good understanding of asset allocation, I doubt you'd benefit from paying regular fees to a FA. At the same time you may still find value in having a FA review your portfolio from time to time, as they might offer insights that you have missed out on...
I'd also suggest that the fact that you are on this board makes you different to most investors - your interested in the topic, most are not, they are happy to have someone else deal with that stuff, even if they could do it themselves.
Jim