Does it actually go to the State?I don't have statistics, but the PSO Levy and VAT go to the State.
VAT is charged on the PSO Levy.
In the case of the bill where the electric usage was €15.11, the VAT & PSO Levy amounted to €19.31.
Does it actually go to the State?I don't have statistics, but the PSO Levy and VAT go to the State.
VAT is charged on the PSO Levy.
In the case of the bill where the electric usage was €15.11, the VAT & PSO Levy amounted to €19.31.
Ok, so short of an examination by someone like the Comptroller and Auditor General we really don't know how much of that €335.4 is really being used properly. It looks like yet another subsidy paid by urban dwellers to rural dwellers.Well, obviously, VAT goes to the State.
The PSO Levy is a State subsidy paid for by users of electricity. Information from the CER:
“The proceeds of the levy are used to contribute to the additional relevant costs incurred by PSO-supported electricity generation which are not recovered in the electricity market, in many cases via contracts that suppliers have in place with electricity generators. The policy and terms associated with PSO levy supported plant are mandated by Government in the relevant legislation and approved by the European Commission.
The CER has no discretion over the terms of PSO schemes. The CER’s only role here is to calculate the PSO levy in accordance with Government policy and to help ensure that the scheme is administered appropriately and efficiently. As part of this role, the CER calculates the costs properly incurred under the relevant PSO contracts/schemes to be recovered.
ESB Networks collects the PSO levy from electricity suppliers (paid for by customers) and passes it to EirGrid. EirGrid sends these PSO monies to relevant generators/suppliers.”
The PSO levy was €335.4 million for the levy period that ran from 1st October 2014 to 30th September 2015.
I cannot see any later figures.
I understand that the PSO Levy is to increase from October next.
The fact that professionals are so protected and so overpaid feeds into everything and increases costs across the board.
yes and they are so smug in their long established sheltered positions , they see it as the natural order of things that they be allowed gouge
A professional is someone who is a member of a self regulating body and needs to be a member of that body in order to work in that job. You can't work as a doctor without being a member of the ICGP (or whatever) etc. The idea predates the idea of State regulation and is somewhat redundant in the modern world where the State regulates the professional bodies and in many cases the majority of the membership of those bodies comes from outside the profession. To me the notion is elitist and redundant and in effect that's the case anyway now that everyone from Teachers to Nurses to god knows what are now professionals. Rightly so as they are all just doing a job, just as Trade Unions are not for Tradespeople.I often hear people complain in general about the cost of professionals but it seems vague. I would consider professionals to include:
- solicitors
- barristers
- doctors
- dentists
- accountants
Who else would you add to the list? Could we gather some clear examples of the practices/fees that people consider excessive?
Supply and demand. It says a lot about Dutch women!According to the Indo fees for the oldest profession are €400 an hour compared to €50 an hour in Hamburg or Amsterdam
As for fees; they market sets the rate (supply and demand). There are plenty of poor barristers. There are no poor doctors. There are few poor accountants. It is strange that people are far more likely to critically assess their accountant or solicitor than their doctor.
One third of doctors out of Trinity are foreign students who pay massive fees to train here and most of them would never have planned in staying here. I'm sure the figures for the RCSI is the same or higher.As noted earlier though, the market doesn't supply the doctors. There are lots of students who would very much like to become doctors and work in ireland but they are being artificially constrained from doing so by the arbitrary number of medical places available in the CAO system.
We should double the number of places for doctors, but get them to sign up to 10 years public service - or pay back the fees. I believe a similar setup is the case in Canada.
It's ludicrous that we don't have anough doctors and a lot of the small number we do train up immediately emigrate.
Supply and demand. It says a lot about Dutch women!
You can't work as a doctor without being a member of the ICGP (or whatever) etc.
Now if we can just stop doctors telling everyone what job they do that would also be great or should everyone insist on being referred to by the title of their job? It seems utterly bizarre, can you imagine being introduced to someone and them saying "Hi, I'm Teacher Mary Murphy."?
As for fees; they market sets the rate (supply and demand). There are plenty of poor barristers. There are no poor doctors. There are few poor accountants. It is strange that people are far more likely to critically assess their accountant or solicitor than their doctor.
As noted earlier though, the market doesn't supply the doctors. There are lots of students who would very much like to become doctors and work in ireland but they are being artificially constrained from doing so by the arbitrary number of medical places available in the CAO system.
We should double the number of places for doctors, but get them to sign up to 10 years public service - or pay back the fees. I believe a similar setup is the case in Canada.
It's ludicrous that we don't have anough doctors and a lot of the small number we do train up immediately emigrate.
One third of doctors out of Trinity are foreign students who pay massive fees to train here and most of them would never have planned in staying here. I'm sure the figures for the RCSI is the same or higher.
When Doctors Unions talk about the high numbers of doctors who emigrate and say that the reason for that is contracts or pay etc they are telling lies.
That is incorrect. Intern (1st year doctor) places have increased by 50% from 488 in 2004 to 733 in 2017. The Fottrell report said we need over 700, so we are at the target. We have more medical students than ever, the majority of whom are Irish. It is now almost impossible for a non-Irish graduate to get on a training scheme because we have so many Irish doctors coming out of medical schools. In fact, in 2016 there were Irish medical graduates who could not get intern places. So the bottleneck is not with medical schools.
Doctors emigrate because they are paid better abroad, have better working conditions, and are treated better. The same for nurses. If you ask them to pay back fees, you will just be encouraging them go to Aus or NZ or USA or Canada where they will finish their training more quickly and be better paid at the end of it.
Friend who is an accountant, also renting small apartment, drives an 06 Fiesta, has modest savings.
There are no barriers to entry for Accountants as far as I can tell. Plenty of bodies you can sign up to, do the exams and your qualified.
Doctors numbers are regulated through the shortage of places in medical schools.
From a GP perspective, I'm not sure how practices work...do you have to buy out an existing one to get set up? If yes, then thats another roadblock to entry.
From speaking to a young Vet who had to go to Budapest after not getting the points for Ireland, he returned to work for a large practice. He explained to me that you just culdn't go into an area and start working as a Vet, you had to buy out an existing practice.
Barristers/Solicitors...limited number of places each year through Kings Inns/Law Library?
Dentists. Very high points suggest limitied number of students accepted every year?
Good to see things have ramped up... I think though we are suffering a legacy somewhat of the under-training as it will take time for these additionals numbers to have an impact.
And the point of asking them to pay back fees is that you would only do so if they didn't work in Ireland for X years. So it would be a disincentive to emigration.
i grew up in rural ireland , if you had a routine of doing your shopping in super valu every week , were you to make a change and instead go to tesco , you were not met at the door by someone telling you to go back to super value , different story with the GP clinics operating in the general area , if you were registered in a particular practice but decided you didnt care for the doctor there , were you to ring up the GP clinic six miles over the road , more often than not you were refused an appointment and directly told to go back to where you were registered , whatever about cities , in rural parts GP,s had an unwritten contract with each other that they would not " steal " each others patients , they all more or less had the same fees too
If I had to choose between your suggestion of (1) fee-free education in exchange for 10 years mandatory service in a public hospital or (2) a €150,000 loan which I could pay back by going to USA, finishing my training in 4 years, work in a better environment, and be paid twice what I would get in Ireland, then I would be hugely incentivised to emigrate.